Unsure how to explain this?

vittpsu21

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 10, 2023
Messages
591
Reaction score
533
Location
Pittsburgh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey All,


Display: 200g
Sump 74g

For reference, I do weekly water changes, tank is still somewhat new? First fish were added September 18th (2 Clowns, 1 Royal). I have since before even adding these fish microdosed phyto. I haven't added anything to the tank until about 2 days ago, I finished my first QT rotation (about 2 months) and I moved over 4Pj's and 1 Firefish. For reference I use a Hanna to test my ammonia, I tested for the entire first week back in September when I added the fish, it never was above 0.03-0.05 so just some noise I think and then stopped testing as it was stable.

I moved over the QT fish as mentioned above about 24-48 hours ago and started testing Ammonia, I was expecting it to just be in the normal range. The first reading about 24 hours ago came back at 0.26. I had run out of live phyto and for the first time dosed some concetrated phyto to hold me over until my live stuff was shipped (the weather has been cold), I read online that this can sometimes interfere with the ammonia readings so I discontinued dosing this (last does was about exactly 24 hours ago). I woke up today to test again and this time got a reading of 0.31, again expected it to maybe be interference from the phyto or something but obviously not? In hindsight I probably should have tested the ammonia for a new baseline before moving the fish (live and learn I can't fix this now). So all I have is the baseline from back in September and the fact that the 3 fish had been fine before that. All of the fish 3 originals + the 5 additions all look normal to me in the tank, the inverts and corals too but I am trying to understand this reading and really can't wrap any logic around it. I know Hanna test for both toxic and non toxic ammonia, but its very puzzling to me that this number is so large? The only real changes are that I now dose 2 part (which as I understand it should have no impact on ammonia, and the concentrated phyto which I stopped 24 hours ago). I am open to any suggestions here... I would image with all my rock, sand, live rock in sump that there has to be more than enough bacteria to handle the load? I do have some old bottled bacteria I used in my QT to cycle but it was opened 2ish months ago so not sure how viable that really is? As an additional test I also though ok maybe the cuvettes had leftover stuff in them since I haven't used them in so long, so I used a brand new cuvette and tested again, came back at 0.30 so still in the same range!

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. The tank is obviously cycled if fish have been in it for months but is it possible despite the size of the tank that there is not enough bacteria to handle the 5 additional fish that moved over on top of the 3 that already where in there?
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,239
Reaction score
92,255
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
0.3 ppm ammonia is not at a toxic level, or even close, and I would not even spend time trying to determine if it is accurate or not.

Ammonia may rise when you effectively add more ammonia than it is accustomed to. If accurate, it will likely drop back before long.
 
OP
OP
vittpsu21

vittpsu21

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 10, 2023
Messages
591
Reaction score
533
Location
Pittsburgh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
0.3 ppm ammonia is not at a toxic level, or even close, and I would not even spend time trying to determine if it is accurate or not.

Ammonia may rise when you effectively add more ammonia than it is accustomed to. If accurate, it will likely drop back before long.
ok thanks for this, I was just so perplexed when I was used to seeing 0.03/0.05. But this is at least reassuring, I did not for the life of me understand
 

dedragon

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
6,901
Reaction score
4,939
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
after the tank cycles i barely if ever test ammonia. It shouldnt ever be an issue unless you really overstocked or dumped a bunch in. for the qt system, different story, but in the dt dw about it
 
OP
OP
vittpsu21

vittpsu21

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 10, 2023
Messages
591
Reaction score
533
Location
Pittsburgh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
after the tank cycles i barely if ever test ammonia. It shouldnt ever be an issue unless you really overstocked or dumped a bunch in. for the qt system, different story, but in the dt dw about it
yeah I legit only tested cause I added 5 fish, but tbh in a 275 gal system, 8 fish to me seems like a drop in the bucket. First tank for me though, and I am overly anxious about stuff so hence the post
 
OP
OP
vittpsu21

vittpsu21

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 10, 2023
Messages
591
Reaction score
533
Location
Pittsburgh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Figured I would just post a little update here and what my conclusion is...

so 0.31--->0.29--->0.30-->0.29--- and today 0.27

I am mostly thinking the hanna is picking up something thats not real ammonia or not toxic, because after 5 days I would have seen something on the fish or inverts/corals etc. Anyway figured I would just post a little update, if I had done a baseline reading before moving the fish I bet my number woulda been higher than the 0.03/0.05 I was used to months and months ago when the first 3 fish went in.

I did expect the number to drop but yeah idk lol, I am not overly worried cause everything looks fine and the tank is huge but just figured I would update here for those interested
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 26.8%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 35.4%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.9%
Back
Top