- Joined
- Apr 20, 2018
- Messages
- 537
- Reaction score
- 116
- What state or country do you live in
- California
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To me it looks good considering you know that you have to control the flow to get the correct dose . That said you only show one pipe therefore without a PROVEN flow for both algae , and parasites you can only set up for one . Also consider a by pass for maintainance
? No, he can set up to kill both algae and parasites. Exposure needed to kill parasites will also absoluetly kill algae. Although not vice versa.To me it looks good considering you know that you have to control the flow to get the correct dose . That said you only show one pipe therefore without a PROVEN flow for both algae , and parasites you can only set up for one . Also consider a by pass for maintainance
Yes, it will be fine. Unless the UV feed pump is somehow pushing more water than the return pump, that skimmer chamber will fill to the baffle level.There will be a valve before the water enters the uv… my main question is will the skimmer be efficient with the water in that chamber?
Theres baffles in the drawing. and if the return is turned off the water level of teh sump as a whole will raise above the baffles, making the UV pump net zero.When you turn off the return pump for maintenance or feeding your UV pump will drain the skimmer section. That might cause some tuning issues with the skimmer. Most operate best with constant water level. If you have to plumb the UV into the sump I would return it to the skimmer section. You'll have slightly less efficiency but only slightly.
Since you're still in design phase. I would recommend plumbing the skimmer on it's own line. Either directly to/from main tank or tapping off main drain and returning to tank. Put a variable speed pump for flow. That way you can adjust for either algae or pathogens as needed. Not all undesirable organisms respond to same flow.
A UV is a big expense not to use as effectively as possible.
I can put the uv pump in the first chamber with the skimmer since it’s the largest. I just liked the look and space available by having skimmer in mid chamberI have plumbed a bunch of UVs this way, and others. Your proposed design is what I've done in my 90 gallon at home for about 8 years. It's generally considered better than running it in the opposite manner, which causes some of the water already processed by the UV to get processed again.
The only difference in mine is that my sump only has 2 chambers, so my skimmer is in the first chamber along with the UV pump. I think you'll just need to think about and monitor the flow rate through the UV. If your return pump is pushing more water than your UV pump then the difference between the two is the exchange rate your skimmer will see. If they are equal (in theory) then your skimmer won't have any water pass over it.
So...could you put the UV pump in the chamber with the skimmer? That might solve all of the concerns.