water cycling

jkush710

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 29, 2015
Messages
76
Reaction score
26
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No leave it off, it will prolong the cycle and possibly create a smaller biological filter after the cycle is complete.
 

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
29,735
Reaction score
23,725
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Team I have to disagree 100% its the opposite, it w change nothing
 

Pete polyp

acro serial killer
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
5,828
Reaction score
1,894
Location
Arkansas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Team I have to disagree 100% its the opposite, it w change nothing
It would remove organics that are needed for the cycle to happen. You would chance having inadequate biological filtration if you removed the nutrients before the cycle is finished.
 

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
29,735
Reaction score
23,725
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
this is my case:

we deal with incidental bacteria all the time in the reef tank, on surfaces that when removed are literally total export of that bacteria such as when a DSB is removed and the live rock still handles all requirements of the prior bioload. Its true nitrifiers were removed, but it was incidental and no cycle resulted. Many people are dosing direct cleaning ammonia as well, not using protein complexes for their feed. and if using the rotting shrimp, they vary so much anyway that skimming or not skimming wont matter to the bacteria getting the varied feed off rotting shrimp but still sustaining in other ways. after all, there was a time 20 yrs ago we cycled tanks by adding only water and waiting two mos, talk about sterility. and somehow every guppy tank on the planet will still cycle in spite of no human additions given a little time.

simply claiming the skimmer can't make things clean enough to really cause a notable delay.

agreed skimmin pre removes helpful proteins before they break down and contribute, but it cannot strip the alternate ammonia sources a plenty that nitrifiers access because a large portion of the feed comes from aggregates between nitrifiers and other bacteria, nitrifiers are rarely if ever found alone the articles show, they are associates and gain feed from this grouping.

take one food source away, they find another, just like algae in many tanks.
 
Last edited:

Lenny_S

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 15, 2015
Messages
796
Reaction score
398
Location
Dutchess County, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Team I have to disagree 100% its the opposite, it w change nothing
I used Prodibio Digest for my cycle and the instructions were to remove filter socks, sponges, and media (carbon, GFO, etc...) and turn off protein skimmers. I wondered why? So I looked into it further...
To keep it kind of short, the bacteria is free floating in the water until it settles and establishes on a surface (rock, glad, sand). All of those things mentioned above that are recommended to be removed will catch the free floating bacteria before it has a chance to establish on a more permanent surface in your system. It will not prevent your tank from cycling, but it will make it take longer.
I also found that you risk ammonia spikes if you cycle your tank with removable media in place because they tend to harbor large strong colonies of bacteria. This suppresses strong colonies from establishing on permanent surfaces (essentially starving them). Once that media is changed, removed, or cleaned (usually after a decent amount of adding livestock) you run a high risk of an ammonia spike and another cycle.
Anyway, that's all from research and not personal experience. I just follow the instructions, so take it for what it's worth I guess.
 

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
29,735
Reaction score
23,725
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I disagree with the claims made by the retail additive co but that's nbd, the tanks w still cycle in the end. many cycling threads already have done it in the way described w or wo skimmer and tracking the time frames across cycling threads using skimmers or no skimmers. im claiming that incidental surface area is already aeons established to share between nitrifiers and alt heterotrophs such that we aren't affecting it much other than to give the nitrifiers a good alt feed source.
 
Last edited:

Lenny_S

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 15, 2015
Messages
796
Reaction score
398
Location
Dutchess County, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I disagree with the claims made by the retail additive co but that's nbd, the tanks w still cycle in the end. I disagree it would add significant time, simply by having already done it in the way described w or wo skimmer and tracking the time frames across cycling threads using skimmers or no skimmers.
Actually the instructions for use was the only part of that from Prodibio. All that other stuff was from a bunch of other pretty reliable sources. But I didn't track all the references so couldn't fully recreate the research.
It's rather moot though if we're only talking about the protein skimmer. If you're cycling a tank you have no livestock in it (hopefully). So it really doesn't matter if it's on or off.
 

Algae invading algae: Have you had unwanted algae in your good macroalgae?

  • I regularly have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 49 35.3%
  • I occasionally have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 29 20.9%
  • I rarely have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 11 7.9%
  • I never have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 10 7.2%
  • I don’t have macroalgae.

    Votes: 36 25.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 4 2.9%
Back
Top