Why a sediment filter and not two carbon filters?

ichthyogeek

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Messages
2,070
Reaction score
1,918
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So in a typical 4-stage RODI setup, it's sediment filter->carbon filter->RO membrane->DI filter. If both the sediment filter and the carbon filter have the same micron rating (usually around 5 uM), then, aside from cost, why not just use two carbon filters? Am I missing something?
 
So in a typical 4-stage RODI setup, it's sediment filter->carbon filter->RO membrane->DI filter. If both the sediment filter and the carbon filter have the same micron rating (usually around 5 uM), then, aside from cost, why not just use two carbon filters? Am I missing something?
Its basically a pre-filter so you don't clog the carbon block prematurely. As quickly as my sediment clogs up, I can't even imagine how fast my carbon block would be rendered useless
 
The carbon filter is serving a different purpose to the sediment filter. It’s job is to remove lots of chemicals, particularly Chlorine and Chloramine. As said above without the Sediment filter to remove large solids it will quickly clog up and dramatically reduce your water production. The sediment filter due to it’s open weave construction can suspend vastly more large solids than the carbon filter can.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT DO YOU ALWAYS RUN OUT OF AT THE WORST TIME?

  • Salt mix

    Votes: 15 17.6%
  • Fish or coral food

    Votes: 5 5.9%
  • Test kits or reagents

    Votes: 8 9.4%
  • Filter media or replacement fleece

    Votes: 5 5.9%
  • RO/DI filters or supplies

    Votes: 14 16.5%
  • Fragging and repair supplies, like glue or epoxy

    Votes: 10 11.8%
  • I keep a backup of everything

    Votes: 21 24.7%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 7 8.2%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new