XR30 Blue's with Seneye

  • Thread starter Thread starter ReefPig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
I just got my hands on a 510. The seneye definitely runs "hot" compared to the 510. Seneye is ~30-40% higher. Measurements taken back to back, ~6" under surface, direct center (both sensors pointing at the light).

Even though I started this discussion, I’ve pretty much kept out of it, as most people seem to have put it down to “you’re stupid for getting those lights on that tank, the Seneye is right”.

I know my tank, I’m not a newb, I know the Seneye is wrong, but I do not have access to an Apogee to prove it.

Would be very interested to understand more about your testing.
light height, measurement depth, intensity, how many units and how close together.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 19 33.9%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 7 12.5%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 8 14.3%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 12 21.4%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 9 16.1%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 9 16.1%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 2 3.6%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 4 7.1%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 2 3.6%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new