1000 mah ldd drivers too much?

coralbeauties

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
1,215
Reaction score
942
Location
Yellow Springs ohio
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
I have a frag tank and a display tank which both have the same diy lights other then the drivers. The display has an ardurino system with 1000 mah ldd drivers and my corals dont have as good p/e as my corals in the frag tank that the light is driven off the standard 700 meanwell driver. I am beginning to wonder if the 1000 drivers are too much. colors are fine in both tanks and they do share the same water. Before I go and order $60 worth of new 700 ldd drivers I thought I would throw this out here for any opinions.
thanks
Jeff
 

twilliard

Tank pests..
View Badges
Joined
Jun 3, 2015
Messages
10,333
Reaction score
8,909
Location
Central Washington
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would think that would be the same as dimming the led chips from 1000ma to 700ma
Are you running the DT at 100%?
 
OP
OP
coralbeauties

coralbeauties

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
1,215
Reaction score
942
Location
Yellow Springs ohio
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
From what I was told on another thread, the leds will be driven at 1000ma but just cycled on and off more often to attain the dimming effect. So if I am understanding it right the corals would be getting the punch of the 1000ma drivers but for not as long. with full power being at 255 I believe that I have them set at 175.
thanks
jeff
 

twilliard

Tank pests..
View Badges
Joined
Jun 3, 2015
Messages
10,333
Reaction score
8,909
Location
Central Washington
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The dimming drivers regulate current

Screenshot_2016-08-13-09-50-40.png
 

TheEngineer

Formerly icecool2
View Badges
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
7,296
Reaction score
6,385
Location
PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The LDD drivers are constant current so they will, ideally, always put out 1000mA of current when on. I would need to look clos r to see what the actual output of these are when being controlled. That said, they probably are modulated by a duty cycle output. (Aka they blink on and off)

There's really little difference, in my opinion, between running them with a reduced duty cycle and running them at lower current. You need to think about a longer time period than each blink. The brightness we see is an integration of all of the photons hitting our eyes. The chlorophyll in the corals works the same way. The lower the duty cycle, the less photons produced.
 

theatrus

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 26, 2016
Messages
2,253
Reaction score
3,603
Location
Sacramento, CA area
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There is one thing that's missing here: a 70% 1000mA driver and a 100% 700mA driver will have the same energy delivered ( not actually true but bear with me for a moment), but the 100% 700mA setup will actually put out more PAR. Why? LED efficiency is not linear with drive current, and a 700mA driven LED is more efficient, even if it's on 100% of the time.

A LEDs Vf (forward voltage, the voltage drop) also scales with the drive current, usually linearly in the area we are concerned about. It increases as current increases. More Vf means more power from the driver, even if current remains the same.

So not only do you get lower PAR, you're also using more energy to do so.

How much? We need to look at the charts on the LED data sheets. It could be a noticeable difference.

For example, here is the Luxeon T:

pbQCvmp.png


At 1000mA it will deliver only ~1.3(2?)x the light than at 700mA, for 1.35x the current. Not too great of a difference, but still around 3-4%. If the increase in current were to change the Tj (junction temperature) the difference would be bigger.
 
Last edited:

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 26.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 34.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 29 22.5%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.5%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.8%
Back
Top