250w vs 400w

wakeboardgeek

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
330
Reaction score
0
Location
Southern Maryland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm very cautious of power usage on my tank and the following two scenarios differ by a few cents per month. What would you choose for a SPS dominated tank (T5 and LED supplementation), 24" deep.

250w on for 6 hours
400w on for 4 hours
 

OMG Corals

meat popsicle
View Badges
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
Location
Ocala, fl
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
24" deep = 400w IMO. I use 3 400w on my 180 supplemented with t5. I run them 7 hrs. Great growth and color.
 

JackoChang

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 12, 2011
Messages
440
Reaction score
1
Location
Colorado
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sell them both and get LEDs. Seriously though, I'd go with the 250's. I used to have 400's on my 120 (24" deep) and bleached lots of LPS on the sand bed, I had SPS in the middle and near the top and they bleached. Switched to 250w MH equivalent LEDs and color came back.
 

dakotasreef

Prestige Worldwide
View Badges
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
468
Reaction score
3
Location
Woodsboro,Md
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Your choice of reflector can also make a bog difference. If you are going to have softies and lps on the bottom I say go 250. If you choose a good reflector you could do 250 in a sps tank. I run 400's in a 24" tank with radiums and love the growth and color. The only downside is viewing times. My lights are only on for 6 hours.
 

Paul_N

MOD
View Badges
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
3,964
Reaction score
71
Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would go with 250w for 6 hours and run supplemental for 8 to 10 hours. If you have the right reflectors, there is no need for 400w IMO. I have 250w with lumenbright reflectors that will go on a 220 that is 30" high.
 
OP
OP
W

wakeboardgeek

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
330
Reaction score
0
Location
Southern Maryland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would go with 250w for 6 hours and run supplemental for 8 to 10 hours. If you have the right reflectors, there is no need for 400w IMO. I have 250w with lumenbright reflectors that will go on a 220 that is 30" high.

I guess I should have mentioned that I'm using lumenbright minis right now with 250w so the reflectors would stay the same.
 

hybridazn

Acro killer.....
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
7,925
Reaction score
9,753
Location
Grapeville PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
24" deep = 400w IMO. I use 3 400w on my 180 supplemented with t5. I run them 7 hrs. Great growth and color.

How far do u have them mounted off the surface of the water?

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
 

Paul_N

MOD
View Badges
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
3,964
Reaction score
71
Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I guess I should have mentioned that I'm using lumenbright minis right now with 250w so the reflectors would stay the same.

I am running them over my temp setup which is a 110 gallon rubbermade and I have the bulbs 24" off the surface of the water. my coral and clams are anywhere from 28" to 40" below the bulbs.
 

iani

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
1,058
Reaction score
96
Location
Berkeley, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Which bulbs are you planning on running (and on what kind of ballasts)? That will make a big difference.
 

iani

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
1,058
Reaction score
96
Location
Berkeley, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok so to run the 250w 20k radiums properly you need magnetic HQI ballast or those newish selectable e-ballasts. You typically want to run the 250w radiums @ ~300 watts. For the 400w radiums you normally want to run then as close to about 360 watts. For the 400w radiums you want to run them on normal electronic ballasts (ie ice caps). I've heard the par difference from the 250w hqi and the 400w electronics is minimal. I run 3 250w HQI ballast on radiums on my 72x30x24" tank.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 4 40.0%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 4 40.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new