9415

rtague

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
164
Reaction score
56
Location
new york
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi Roger,I have a 12.5" x14. 5" section in my sump on a 120g heavy bio load,will the 9415 skimmer fit in this space?,I'm also running the algae reactor.
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
14,092
Reaction score
23,102
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi Roger,I have a 12.5" x14. 5" section in my sump on a 120g heavy bio load,will the 9415 skimmer fit in this space?,I'm also running the algae reactor.
With the algae reactor you could easily use a 9410dc. I run one with no algae reactor or fuge on my 120.
20190918_190555.jpg
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
14,092
Reaction score
23,102
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There are a couple of good 9410 reviews on google.
Also google Glen Fong DSR.
He runs a 9410dc on a 150. His tanks are as heavy of a bioload as you can have.
My tank is based off of his method.
 
OP
OP
R

rtague

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
164
Reaction score
56
Location
new york
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There are a couple of good 9410 reviews on google.
Also google Glen Fong DSR.
He runs a 9410dc on a 150. His tanks are as heavy of a bioload as you can have.
My tank is based off of his method.
Thank you, appreciate the info.
 

rvitko

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
2,326
Reaction score
1,524
Location
Buda, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It would fit without the filter bag attached, it may be possible if you angled everything right to squeeze in the filter bag. The filter bags main job is bubble trap and splash control, but it also gives some mechanical filtration and a place to add a bag of carbon for example.
 
OP
OP
R

rtague

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
164
Reaction score
56
Location
new york
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you I'm assuming the 9410 would be ok in this space,probably pushing that unit to the limit,you think?
 

rvitko

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
2,326
Reaction score
1,524
Location
Buda, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It all depends on fish load, generally you are on the margin of which one to use, but I have before and it is entirely doable to have a slightly smaller skimmer and compensate with algae and media and carbon dosing and do just fine. If the fish are relatively small, I would generally recommend the 9410 for your tank size, my only hesitation is larger or heavier feeding fish and if a lot of the corals are SPS, bigger would be better.
 
OP
OP
R

rtague

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
164
Reaction score
56
Location
new york
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It all depends on fish load, generally you are on the margin of which one to use, but I have before and it is entirely doable to have a slightly smaller skimmer and compensate with algae and media and carbon dosing and do just fine. If the fish are relatively small, I would generally recommend the 9410 for your tank size, my only hesitation is larger or heavier feeding fish and if a lot of the corals are SPS, bigger would be better.
Thanks Roger,small fish,no sps,going to cut back to 2 feedings,think I'll go with the 9410.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 51 27.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 57 30.5%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 40 21.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 23 12.3%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 16 8.6%
Back
Top