9415

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

rtague

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
164
Reaction score
57
Location
new york
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi Roger,I have a 12.5" x14. 5" section in my sump on a 120g heavy bio load,will the 9415 skimmer fit in this space?,I'm also running the algae reactor.
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
9,168
Reaction score
15,914
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi Roger,I have a 12.5" x14. 5" section in my sump on a 120g heavy bio load,will the 9415 skimmer fit in this space?,I'm also running the algae reactor.
With the algae reactor you could easily use a 9410dc. I run one with no algae reactor or fuge on my 120.
20190918_190555.jpg
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
9,168
Reaction score
15,914
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There are a couple of good 9410 reviews on google.
Also google Glen Fong DSR.
He runs a 9410dc on a 150. His tanks are as heavy of a bioload as you can have.
My tank is based off of his method.
 
OP
OP
R

rtague

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
164
Reaction score
57
Location
new york
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There are a couple of good 9410 reviews on google.
Also google Glen Fong DSR.
He runs a 9410dc on a 150. His tanks are as heavy of a bioload as you can have.
My tank is based off of his method.
Thank you, appreciate the info.
 

rvitko

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
1,823
Reaction score
1,181
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It would fit without the filter bag attached, it may be possible if you angled everything right to squeeze in the filter bag. The filter bags main job is bubble trap and splash control, but it also gives some mechanical filtration and a place to add a bag of carbon for example.
 
OP
OP
R

rtague

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
164
Reaction score
57
Location
new york
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you I'm assuming the 9410 would be ok in this space,probably pushing that unit to the limit,you think?
 

rvitko

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
1,823
Reaction score
1,181
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It all depends on fish load, generally you are on the margin of which one to use, but I have before and it is entirely doable to have a slightly smaller skimmer and compensate with algae and media and carbon dosing and do just fine. If the fish are relatively small, I would generally recommend the 9410 for your tank size, my only hesitation is larger or heavier feeding fish and if a lot of the corals are SPS, bigger would be better.
 
OP
OP
R

rtague

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
164
Reaction score
57
Location
new york
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It all depends on fish load, generally you are on the margin of which one to use, but I have before and it is entirely doable to have a slightly smaller skimmer and compensate with algae and media and carbon dosing and do just fine. If the fish are relatively small, I would generally recommend the 9410 for your tank size, my only hesitation is larger or heavier feeding fish and if a lot of the corals are SPS, bigger would be better.
Thanks Roger,small fish,no sps,going to cut back to 2 feedings,think I'll go with the 9410.
 

Creating a strong bulwark: Did you consider floor support for your reef tank?

  • I put a major focus on floor support.

    Votes: 26 40.0%
  • I put minimal focus on floor support.

    Votes: 15 23.1%
  • I put no focus on floor support.

    Votes: 22 33.8%
  • Other.

    Votes: 2 3.1%
Back
Top