Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am not sure what this is supposed to prove. If I put Live sand, a damsel and shrimp into a 1 quart tank, my guess is that there would be problems within a couple days. If I put the same into 5000 gallons of water - there would be no problems. Somewhere in-between there is not enough ammonia produced to cause problems - but it all depends on bioload IMHOhey u know what
I thought this was the seneye thread lol I asked for ammonia testing on a thread where the bane of progress is ammonia testing admit that's funny
Fish + Insta rock + clean water + feeding handled = welcome!!
Yes - I guess I'm surprised that anyone would think that if they take rock from an established aquarium and move it to another tank (within a reasonable period of time) that they would need to re-cycle. To me thats common sense?Our focus is purely on the rock for these reasons:
not any place in written literature discusses skip cycling other than blog posts, nothing formal. For example cycle gurus and bottle bac sellers have not formally come out and plainly said: there are some reefs you NEVER need to use bottle bac. We said that and will show decades of examples
There’s always risk posted in today's cycle assessments, how testing will be required to know a plain start date. We’d have to test total ammonia to know, or we’d have to see the live rock move exactly two ppm to zero to be sure. A doubt 100% accompanies every assessment.
we need a running counter at all times to even out the sales machine that has been ingrained in all of us
Our job here is to separate the massive sales machine of bottle bac from instances we will never ever need any, to cycle a new system.
another use is teaching pure resolve to cyclers as this entire thread is free of hesitation, there isn’t a cycling guide in the universe that doesn’t have a wait factor, we do not have one. All cycling materials imply a consequence for non conformity and we show that to be false, and the result of training doubt into all cycles is the inevitable click, buy, feel better but the outcomes were the same anyway.
we want to show how a person can clean their reef or move it to conventions without any issues, and we wanted to show how for about thirty years the buying public has been given totally untrue rules for cycling compared to sellers of cycle fix products.
using our visual verification approach (find a feather duster worm attached, some algae, maybe some real coralline that’s whorled and you can plainly see it’s not painted, maybe see a sponge or a living vermitid spike) any rock buyer wont get duped into paying for bacteria twice...once on the rock and then once as a $14 purchase of cycling bacteria.
The only way to make any proof in reefing using anecdotes is to pattern them out so far, so beyond past doubt, that even eternal skeptics like aquabiomics can be won over. Careful reading shows a link (post #2) where Eli ribs me pretty well in 2017 regarding the inability to visually cycle live rock (without testing) and so begins a journey where ten thousand visually verified cycles will be linked. motivisation
there are cycles that require absolutely no testing because there isn’t anything to doubt, we already know the pertinent levels when rocks have living attachments on them.
why that statement isn’t written into formal training is beyond me, we are proving it right here in every page. Poof no eyebrows has it exactly right, he knew the origin of that rock and could trust that his new reef would indeed make the show start time. Nice n simple his cycle was done
Brandon. The bioload in this tank is so small, there is no need to add 'extra bacteria'. Second, I'm not sure why you think this is such a miracle. Buying 'live sand' is probably more expensive than buying 'dead sand' and adding bacteria. Either way - the 'aquarium industry' is getting people to spend money. Let me know when someone adds a full cadre of fish to a 90 gallon tank - in a 'skip cycle' (as compared to 3-4 small fish).I truly want to know why no cycling log in the history of reefing ever said it that concise.
why is skip cycling not mentioned in any article about cycling
why is it not in books as a core tenet
100% of them advise opposite.
its test, dose, wait, hope, believe whatever api tells you no matter what...
I think they're training us to be buyers, consumers, needy folk is why. only sellers get the information we're trading here. Buyers do the buying and redundant safety purchases just in case totally wet surfaces moved among tanks lost their bac just in case.
it's illegal to use bottle bac in this thread. if someone does, a member of the tang police working weekend cycling guard duty will come and cite you.
I think this is the weirdest bit to me personally. The premise of this entire thread is we have all been brainwashed by "Big Bac" into buying bacteria in a bottle when the bac in a bottle is multiple times cheaper than filling the tank with live (and I mean like airshipped) rock.Brandon. The bioload in this tank is so small, there is no need to add 'extra bacteria'. Second, I'm not sure why you think this is such a miracle. Buying 'live sand' is probably more expensive than buying 'dead sand' and adding bacteria. Either way - the 'aquarium industry' is getting people to spend money. Let me know when someone adds a full cadre of fish to a 90 gallon tank - in a 'skip cycle' (as compared to 3-4 small fish).
BTW - I completely agree that many of the 'cycling' methods focus on 'adding stuff'. But IMHO adding 'live rock' and 'live sand' is as expensive or more than adding bacteria and 'dead rock'.
What I think is the MOST interesting thing here is the OP is 'breaking the rules' more by adding a Mandarin (to a tank that isn't 20 years old), as well as corals quickly. It will be very interesting to see how the fish and corals do (to me). I have long said the idea that to keep coral you need a several months old tank is probably false.