Another SPS Browning Thread

CoopsCoralReef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
109
Reaction score
99
Location
Wichita, KS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey everyone. I know the topic of SPS browning has been debated since the beginning of reef keeping, but I thought I would come here and ask for everyone's thoughts on my tank and the reason for my SPS browning. I have a Reefer 250 with the following equipment and parameters.

Flow: 2 MP10 + Return (Sicce 3.0)
Lighting: 3 AI Prime (2 hour ramp up, 7 hours @ 80% 20k, 2 hour ramp down)
Skimmer: Skimz SN-123
Reactor: BRS GFO/Rox Carbon

PH: 7.9-8.0
Alk: 8.5-9.0
Cal: 450
Mag: 1360
NO3: 0.25
PO4: 0.00-0.04

I use Red Sea test kits for all testing, and I like all of them. One thing to note though, my phosphates have always tested to the lower three colors on the color wheel, since the beginning of the tank, and I have tested phosphates every week routinely.

Here is a brief synopsis of the last 5 weeks. On August 19th, I began using Red Sea NOPOX. My nitrates were at 5ppm, and I had some hair algae, so I wanted to bring it down to around 0.5-1ppm. At the same time, I stopped the use of GFO and was only running carbon. After about 3 weeks, my nitrates reached 0.25, so I stopped using NOPOX. My nitrates remain at 0.25. Around this time, or maybe a few days before, I noticed my acros developing a brown tint to them, and all are gaining slightly more brown as the days progress.

At first I believed this may have been a nitrate reduction issue. But after looking at photos, I think the signs point to phosphate. I was seeing very good color (at least I thought so) and some really good growth. Below are 4 photos of my Pearlberry and As the Pearlberry has browned, the algae behind it near the birdsnest has increased.

August 20
ae5c89134c92017c08a8d6e1bea9ad3c.jpg


September 3
f0beb36e0abb17f6b2652f4f1b91079b.jpg


September 14
d7589f41c4b33e616f649a00aefd0d43.jpg


September 23
df504ea8c88250523fb3181816ef2c01.jpg


Could my phosphate kit be bad? I do plan on adding either an additional MP10 or MP40, as I do have some dead spots in the tank (as seen in the photos, one is by the birdsnest). Sorry for the long post; just hoping someone could provide some advice [emoji4][emoji4]
 

Brew12

Electrical Gru
View Badges
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Messages
22,488
Reaction score
57,147
Location
Decatur, AL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't have personal experience, but algae can consume both phosphate and nitrates. You could have high levels of both being introduced into your tank and you won't see it on your tests for this reason.
 

rovster

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
967
Reaction score
445
Location
Miramar, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Based on the rocks alone I would say those are not optimal conditions. Looks like new rock and lots of algae. My advice is don't do anything drastic. Keep things stable and slowly work on lowering nutrients use your eyes on algae as your measuring stick. Also please be cognicent of the fact that it can take several months for this to happen. Too many evaluate changes using days, when in fact it takes weeks to months to really observe a positive change. The acro looks healthy enough. High nutrients could definitely cause the browning.
 

Graffiti Spot

Cat and coral maker
View Badges
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
4,320
Reaction score
3,611
Location
Florida’s west side
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Could be that the phosphates were higher from stopping gfo. Or stopping the carbon source suddenly left too much bacteria to die off. Either way I agree that time will tell. I would continue he gfo if I had algae like that, most likely a carbon source as well.
 

aaron23

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
1,332
Reaction score
792
Location
New York NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
you've got quite a bit of algae growing off of your rocks. agree with everyone that the algae is sucking up all of the nutrients. finding the solution to that will give you the answer to the browning
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top