Are my T5s to dim?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steverd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
With Actinics, they have a lot of the spectrum that a PAR meter will not capture, or only partially captures in the lower part of the visible range, as well as true UV. If you use a better spectrometer, then an Actinic would likely be nearly the same as the B+.

Halides are the same way - lots of spectrum that a PAR meter does not do well with.
No an actinic literally has Less output in par lux or lumen. This is due to the heavy filtration needed to release only that spectrum.
 
Who cares about PAR, Lux or Lumen... those only represent parts of the visible spectrum and corals can use spectrum beyond/outside of this, which Actinic has. For a coral, an Actinic bulb has nearly the same useful output as a B+ or C+... and probably more if you consider that the lower wavelengths have more energy than the waves that make up Lux or Lumen band for human eyesight. Tullio covered this pretty well in his Light Facts video.
 
Did you "break in" your t5s? Also, did you take measurements right after turning on? T5s needs some time after initial turn on to reach full power. They start off a little dim and get stronger the longer they're on, before reaching their peak.
 
Who cares about PAR, Lux or Lumen... those only represent parts of the visible spectrum and corals can use spectrum beyond/outside of this, which Actinic has. For a coral, an Actinic bulb has nearly the same useful output as a B+ or C+... and probably more if you consider that the lower wavelengths have more energy than the waves that make up Lux or Lumen band for human eyesight. Tullio covered this pretty well in his Light Facts video.
Got it. Forget science and engineering.
Magic unseen spectrum that coral need and no meter can detect and and no scone can prove corals need.

Ps. Rub you hands together till they get hot. Then give it to the corals. It’s about 800 nm.
 
You mean pseudoscience? Real science assumes that nature is correct until proven otherwise, not the other way around. Prove that the corals do not need the spectrum that the sun gives. It is Hubris of Man to assume that only spectrum that our eyes can see is valuable. I get that is all that matters with lighting for human needs, thus Lux and Lumen, but you should know the difference...

I thought that you had enough experience to know that at least UV is tremendously valuable, but maybe the comment was just flippant and not anything else.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT’S USUALLY THE FIRST CLUE THAT SOMETHING IS OFF IN YOUR REEF?

  • A fish’s behavior or appetite changes

    Votes: 10 15.9%
  • A coral looks different or stops opening normally

    Votes: 40 63.5%
  • Water clarity or surface appearance changes

    Votes: 9 14.3%
  • Equipment sounds or flow seem different

    Votes: 7 11.1%
  • A test result catches my attention

    Votes: 14 22.2%
  • Algae or other growth starts changing

    Votes: 14 22.2%
  • I usually notice when the problem is already obvious

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • It depends on what’s going on

    Votes: 11 17.5%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 1 1.6%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new