Longnose Hawkfish
Valuable Member
With should be without
Fish or Corals?
- Thread starter Oscaror
- Start date
- Tagged users None
With should be without
I think about the long term answer. What would be more satisfying/captivating/interactive to my personality, corals for sure. I think if I had a bigger tank and able to keep bigger fish, it might make it tougher of a choice. I do like the fish, a lot! I just get a kick out of this little stick glued to a plug going into my tank and turning into something else. Hopefully that something else is coral growth! I love the variety and similarity that corals can have but yet the wild colors! Someday, I will have a wild colored scoly! someday...
tyler1503
2500 Club Member
I'd definitely go for the fish :)
I like how they add so much personality to a tank and they're far more interactive in my opinion. You can add just as much visual excitement with macro algaes, sponge growths and live rock as you can with corals I believe (well, almost as much :P).
Sucks for me that the fish I would have in this tank need to be in species only tanks lol.
I like how they add so much personality to a tank and they're far more interactive in my opinion. You can add just as much visual excitement with macro algaes, sponge growths and live rock as you can with corals I believe (well, almost as much :P).
Sucks for me that the fish I would have in this tank need to be in species only tanks lol.
Similar threads
