- Joined
- Feb 25, 2017
- Messages
- 302
- Reaction score
- 241
Most often, the reason paradigm-shifting data are ignored is because of political pressure. Scientists have historically done pretty well at accepting paradigm shifts as soon as the data indicated the shift was warranted. It is the uninformed public and policymakers who resist the evidence based shifts. The heliocentric solar system, evolution by natural selection, life leads to life (and the absence of spontaneous generation of life), microbes as the source of infections (and not "bad air"), DNA as the molecular entity of inheritance, etc. These all overturned previous paradigms with new data. The scientific community generally embraced the evidence (as it accumulated), but public acceptance on all these issues was very delayed due to religious, political, or philosophical reasons.
Yes, it's projection. No one would believe the scientists if they found the truth b/c of politics, but in reality, they are the ones not believing the scientists b/c of politics.
