Thanks for all the information.I get your skepticism. It's funny because I said to myself, someone will question that statement. Freezing causes a rupturing of cells and a loss of quality. The slower the freeze the worse it is (home freezer). The food industry has moved to flash freezing which produces smaller ice crystals in the cell walls, reducing rupturing, and maintaining moisture and nutritional content. Not an old wives' tale. No where across any food manufacture or in the FDA Food Code will you find a thaw refreeze cycle permitted after the initial freeze on the finished product. There's no study on something like a cube of mysis that's been frozen, thawed, frozen, and thawed again that I'm aware of. It's just not best practice. My insight comes from 30 1/2 years of QA work and regulatory inspection across just about type of food manufacturer. It's really a basic food manufacturing concept.
Quick quote from a health and nutrition site:
For example, freezing and thawing meat more than one time might cause color and odor changes, moisture loss, and increased oxidation of its fat and protein.
Oxidation is a process in which electrons are transferred from one atom to another. When this occurs in meats, it can lead to a significant deterioration in quality.
Can you define: "quality" in this case?
From the information I've gathered so far, quality seems to not be a definition of amount of nutrients available but rather taste, texture, appearance.
Many of those studies also involved testing of foods that had been thawed then heated then refrozen. Which would reduce the quality in terms of providing micro organisms an ideal environment to thrive.
However when it comes down to the actual quantity of nutrients contained in the same mass of food being thawed and frozen again while being kept between 2-8°C was not touched on in enough detail to draw conclusions from.
Thoughts on that?
Last edited:
