ICP High Aluminum help

arking_mark

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,820
Location
Potomac
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Randy Holmes-Farley

I Just got back my 1st Triton ICP test and the Aluminum was identified as high (165 micrograms/l). Reading through the threads, the only source I can think of maybe the Marinepure blocks I am using in my sump as several threads indicate that 'white' media may leach aluminum. Several questions:
  1. Is 165 micrograms/l Al high?
  2. Do you think Marinepure media leaches Al?
  3. Will removing the Marinepure media (if it is the source) resolve the issue with my daily 1% water changes? If so, how long?
  4. Do I need to take other actions?
Thanks in advance!

Other info:
- RODI water for top-off and fresh ASW
- Only used Neomarine and recently switch to TMP salt
- Kalk dosing (BRS Pharma)
- Carbon dosing (Nyos Zero)
- I do mix a ton of different foods (Seachem Marine Flakes, Panta Nouri Polyps, Reef Chili, dki Marine, Masstick, Freeze Dried Mysis, Nyos True Algae, Julian Sprung Sea Veggies)
 
OP
OP
arking_mark

arking_mark

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,820
Location
Potomac
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
One thing to note is that Marinpure put out a video discussing this and states that the ICP process doesn't distinguish between inert and free Al. So high Al may not be accurate...
 

thatmanMIKEson

Reefing ain't easy$
View Badges
Joined
Jan 10, 2021
Messages
4,978
Reaction score
5,010
Location
florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The Marine Pure may well be the source, but I'm not sure that level is high enough to be an issue. In my tests, 250 ug/L was not enough to irritate corals, but 500 ug/L was.
where is the aluminum coming from in your system? or is it the Marine Pure you are saying? sorry just trying to follow along..
 
OP
OP
arking_mark

arking_mark

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,820
Location
Potomac
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
where is the aluminum coming from in your system? or is it the Marine Pure you are saying? sorry just trying to follow along..

There is no source in my relatively new aquarium that I am aware of. I can list the components...
Red Sea 525xl Tank
3" + Deep Sand Bed (started dry)
Rock (started dry)
2 x Red Sea Reefwave 45
Trigger Platinum 34 Sump (fleece roller mat)
Marinepure Blocks
Titanium Heater
Nyos Quantum 160 Skimmer w/ CO2 Scrubber
Chemipur Blue
Vectra L1 Return Pump
Teco TK-1000 Chiller

1% daily AWC
Kalk Reactor (1.8ml/min)
Nyos Zero (carbon 1ml/day)
Red Sea Reef Energy AB+ (40ml/day)
Brightwell ChaetoGro (2ml/day)

Going through the list, the only thing that stood out was Marinepure blocks. There are a bunch of threads on it and elevated Al. According to Marinepur, ICP can't distinguish between inert and free Al. Their material contains inert Al.
 

Courtney Aldrich

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
212
Reaction score
266
Location
Minneapolis
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The aluminum probably came from your Marine Blocks and I suspect is likely present in the water column as fine inert aluminosilicate dust. These blocks are so brittle and easily break up). I think once a nice bacterial biofilm coats them, the leaching of dust is probably minimal, so long as you don't touch them. This is definitely on my list of planned experiments over the summer (if the aluminum is present as fine particles, then one should be able to separate it from dissolved aluminum by high-speed centrifugation or filtration through a 0.3 uM filter). The other common source of aluminum is the water supply. For example the Washington DC water supply (perhaps near your location, Potomac river) has aluminum at an average of 40 ug/L (ppb), but as high as 106 ug/L (ppb) (https://dcwater.com/sites/default/files/documents/2020_dcwater_water_quality_report_0.pdf). Aluminum is removed efficiently by ion-exchange, so if you're using a RO/DI unit, then you're probably removing most of the dissolved aluminum.
 
OP
OP
arking_mark

arking_mark

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,820
Location
Potomac
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The aluminum probably came from your Marine Blocks and I suspect is likely present in the water column as fine inert aluminosilicate dust. These blocks are so brittle and easily break up). I think once a nice bacterial biofilm coats them, the leaching of dust is probably minimal, so long as you don't touch them. This is definitely on my list of planned experiments over the summer (if the aluminum is present as fine particles, then one should be able to separate it from dissolved aluminum by high-speed centrifugation or filtration through a 0.3 uM filter). The other common source of aluminum is the water supply. For example the Washington DC water supply (perhaps near your location, Potomac river) has aluminum at an average of 40 ug/L (ppb), but as high as 106 ug/L (ppb) (https://dcwater.com/sites/default/files/documents/2020_dcwater_water_quality_report_0.pdf). Aluminum is removed efficiently by ion-exchange, so if you're using a RO/DI unit, then you're probably removing most of the dissolved aluminum.

Cool experiment! Looking forward to reading about it.

The blocks have been moved about 3 times and there is definitely fine dust particles from them.

I'm on well and septic and use only RODI water.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,079
Reaction score
63,406
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The aluminum probably came from your Marine Blocks and I suspect is likely present in the water column as fine inert aluminosilicate dust. These blocks are so brittle and easily break up). I think once a nice bacterial biofilm coats them, the leaching of dust is probably minimal, so long as you don't touch them. This is definitely on my list of planned experiments over the summer (if the aluminum is present as fine particles, then one should be able to separate it from dissolved aluminum by high-speed centrifugation or filtration through a 0.3 uM filter).

One complexity to that interpretation is the variable amount of "filtration" that ICP companies do, or have customers do, prior to analysis.

The procedures may change over time, but some (e.g., Marinlabs) claim to do none:


Triton claimed in this forum (at least as I translated their statement about a cyclone) that they they centrifuged.

Oceamo claims to provide a 0.2 micron filter to customers to use:


In my tests with Phosguard, fine filtration (0.45 micron) removed some, but not all of the aluminum that was released. Was it soluble aluminum or even finer particles? I do not know.

 

Courtney Aldrich

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
212
Reaction score
266
Location
Minneapolis
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
One complexity to that interpretation is the variable amount of "filtration" that ICP companies do, or have customers do, prior to analysis.

The procedures may change over time, but some (e.g., Marinlabs) claim to do none:


Triton claimed in this forum (at least as I translated their statement about a cyclone) that they they centrifuged.

Oceamo claims to provide a 0.2 micron filter to customers to use:


In my tests with Phosguard, fine filtration (0.45 micron) removed some, but not all of the aluminum that was released. Was it soluble aluminum or even finer particles? I do not know.

Thanks for pointing this out and I will be sure to go through all of the ICP methods used by companies testing saltwater samples. I just found a nice method that can measure free Al3+ from total aluminum (paper attached). I will try this over the summer if I can track down the equipment at our University. I definitely want to try to distinguish between the different types of aluminum since I think most hobbyist areconcerned about their ICP results, when there likely very little free aluminum.
 

Attachments

  • ChinSciBull2013_Shang_Method to measure free aluminium.pdf
    552.8 KB · Views: 52

Fusion in reefing: How do you feel about grafted corals?

  • I strongly prefer grafted corals and I seek them out to put in my tank.

    Votes: 2 3.7%
  • I find grafted corals appealing and would be open to having them in my tank.

    Votes: 32 59.3%
  • I am indifferent about grafted corals and am not enthusiastic about having them in my tank.

    Votes: 14 25.9%
  • I have reservations about grafted corals and would generally avoid having them in my tank.

    Votes: 5 9.3%
  • I have a negative perception and would avoid having grafted corals in my tank.

    Votes: 1 1.9%
Back
Top