Is copper necessary?

JMM744

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Messages
1,095
Reaction score
993
Location
Lima, Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a sail fin tang, yellow tang, two clowns and a cleaner wrasse in a qt tank. All but the sail fin have been treated with cuprimine twice. Sail fin went in a week ago. They all came from hobbyists tanks. All but the sail fin have been in qt tank for 6-7 weeks. My plan is to dose cuprimine again for the sail fin. Everyone is health and eating out of hand. Clowns are bullies but the others are quick enough to avoid them. Is it really necessary to dose copper for these guys or can they be released into thier intended tank.? The tank is a 70 reef that has been fallow for 4 months except for additions of corals, most of which have been dipped. Just wondering out loud.
Thank you for your thoughts,
Jim
 

Maritimer

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
7,707
Reaction score
13,389
Location
SouthWestern Connecticut
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You can go with an observation-only quarantine, but it should go the full 30 days (introducing the sailfin to QT technically restarts the QT clock for any other fish that's in there with it...). Keep in mind that ich can be harbored in a fish's gills without the fish ever showing outward symptoms. (I should think that would be fairly rare for tangs, they catch ich pretty easily . . . but I'm not a pro.)

If it was my display at risk, I'd probably be ramping up the copper again . . .

~Bruce
 

4FordFamily

Tang, Angel, and Wrasse Nerd!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2015
Messages
20,508
Reaction score
45,793
Location
Carmel, Indiana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Unfortunately zebrasoma that have been in the hobby awhile build a strong resistance to ich and other parasites but will act as great carriers. Copper for full 30 days is what I would do.
 

um02122

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
66
Reaction score
62
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think the full quarantine period is SIX weeks, to allow for a full ich cycle if present on a fish.

Treating with copper where there is no sign of disease is poor practice, as the copper is toxic, even the form contained in Cupramine.

You quarantine to give a chance for a parasite to cause a superinfection - small volume, better chances for the parasite.

On the other side, treating for worms and flukes with Praziquantel is a good idea, too many fish come in the hobby infested.
 

melypr1985

totally addicted
View Badges
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
15,113
Reaction score
22,471
Location
Dallas area
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think the full quarantine period is SIX weeks, to allow for a full ich cycle if present on a fish.

Treating with copper where there is no sign of disease is poor practice, as the copper is toxic, even the form contained in Cupramine.

You quarantine to give a chance for a parasite to cause a superinfection - small volume, better chances for the parasite.

On the other side, treating for worms and flukes with Praziquantel is a good idea, too many fish come in the hobby infested.

Ick is just as prevalent, if not more than flukes is. Treating every fish or coral as if it's carrying ick is smart. Velvet has gained quite a bit of steam as well and is only treated with copper or CP. Of course, if you don't like copper, TTM will treat for ick and can be combined with Prazi for flukes. This will treat ick very effectively and without using copper.
 

Humblefish

Dr. Fish
View Badges
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
22,424
Reaction score
31,573
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ick is just as prevalent, if not more than flukes is. Treating every fish or coral as if it's carrying ick is smart. Velvet has gained quite a bit of steam as well and is only treated with copper or CP. Of course, if you don't like copper, TTM will treat for ick and can be combined with Prazi for flukes. This will treat ick very effectively and without using copper.

^^ Agreed; in a perfect world every disease shows itself in QT, so you don't have to needlessly expose fish to harsh chemicals (medications). However IME, two diseases (ich & flukes) can remain hidden unless you spend LOTS of time in front of the QT watching for key behavioral symptoms: head twitching, scratching on rocks & sand, flashing, heavy breathing. With velvet you may also notice reclusive behavior and the fish swimming into the flow of a powerhead. Any fish that refuses to eat also raises a red flag; although that is not always disease related. o_O

Unfortunately, most people are too busy nowadays to spend even 10-15 minutes in front of a QT. Which is why prophylactic treatment for ich & flukes has become a necessary evil.
 
OP
OP
JMM744

JMM744

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Messages
1,095
Reaction score
993
Location
Lima, Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just a follow up, I observe the fish for extended periods every couple days. The sail fin is a newly placed fish as stated above. After feeding the fish yesterday I noticed the cleaner wrasse doing his usual spastic swimming but after eating he/ she started to swin over against the amonia alert badge and side swipe it several times. Never seen this before but reminded me of a fish doing the same against rock so I am certainly alert to a problem and having already started prozipro will go right to copper once that is done or sooner if I see any other unusual activity or behavior . Thanks again for all the discussion and recommendations. It is most appreciated.
Jim
 

um02122

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
66
Reaction score
62
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Must be a job defect, as a doctor I hate treating infectious diseases "prophylactically".

I might be blessed with a good fish source, as TMC UK has nice treatment facilities and good practices re: livestock. http://wetwebmedia.com/AqBizSubWebIndex/tmcpropc.htm

In all fairness, the QT tank is setup in front of my couch where I'm spending my free time in the evenings; also my wife and daughter keep an hawk eye over the fish and signal even a missing scale.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top