Is even a small refugium worth it?

Perched Urchin

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
153
Reaction score
8
Location
Central Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm setting up a new system with an IM Nuvo Black 40g and an Eshopps AZU-100 sump. Guessing total water volume will be around 50-55 gallons, all said.
I'm thinking of building and adding to the system a small refugium. Based on rough dimensions, the volume will be around 5 gallons. The plan would be to use one of the LEDs specifically for fuges and to stock it with chaeto and possibly other macro algae. I will also likely add some pods to attempt to get a colony going once the system has been established for a bit.

At this size, is doing this going to be beneficial to the system?
 

Raising Reef.

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
115
Reaction score
212
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm setting up a new system with an IM Nuvo Black 40g and an Eshopps AZU-100 sump. Guessing total water volume will be around 50-55 gallons, all said.
I'm thinking of building and adding to the system a small refugium. Based on rough dimensions, the volume will be around 5 gallons. The plan would be to use one of the LEDs specifically for fuges and to stock it with chaeto and possibly other macro algae. I will also likely add some pods to attempt to get a colony going once the system has been established for a bit.

At this size, is doing this going to be beneficial to the system?

Definitely worth it I run a remote refugium no more than that and it’s plenty to have a positive impact.
 

goldenhurricane2

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 29, 2016
Messages
221
Reaction score
58
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm setting up a new system with an IM Nuvo Black 40g and an Eshopps AZU-100 sump. Guessing total water volume will be around 50-55 gallons, all said.
I'm thinking of building and adding to the system a small refugium. Based on rough dimensions, the volume will be around 5 gallons. The plan would be to use one of the LEDs specifically for fuges and to stock it with chaeto and possibly other macro algae. I will also likely add some pods to attempt to get a colony going once the system has been established for a bit.

At this size, is doing this going to be beneficial to the system?

Yes - I've got a 55 gallon (sumpless) with a 5ish gallon HOB refugium and it has been very beneficial.
 

Greybeard

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
3,265
Reaction score
8,411
Location
Buffalo, MO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Refugeum, originally, were intended to be a location for beneficial creatures (copepods, isopods, mysids, worms, etc) to live and breed without pressure from predators. A Refuge... as it were. Macro algae was typically added as a habitat and food source, along with live rock rubble. They were typically lit just enough to keep the macro algae growing. Some implementations didn't have any light at all... using rock rubble only as a habitat (Miracle Mud, whatever).

These days, Refugeum are usually intended as a macro algae nutrient export method. Grow chaetomorpha (or other macro algae, though Chaeto is by far the most popular) as fast as you can, throwing out handfulls as it starts to fill the available space. This is how my system works these days too, though I also keep bio-filter media there. Macro algae export systems are a fabulous way to keep excess nutrients in check. For this, you really do need some fairly extensive real estate. My ref is 26 x 12 x 16" tall, on a roughly 170g total system volume.

However... There's nothing wrong with the original purpose of providing a refuge for beneficial critters. That purpose can be well served with a small volume container. Compact macro algae 'reactors' are filling the nutrient export niche for folks that don't have the real estate for a more typical macro export refugeum.
 

vetteguy53081

Well known Member and monster tank lover
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
108,089
Reaction score
242,651
Location
Wisconsin -
Rating - 100%
17   0   0
Its a refugium. All depends on how you pack it and utilize it but regardless of size is beneficial
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 44 35.5%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.8%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.5%
Back
Top