KH Director

Just curious as to why some people prefer to weigh the water rather than measure it with laboratory graduated cylinders. Seems like the "weighing" method is indirect and allows for more error (scale error; calibration error) while simply putting it in a graduated cylinder gives you a direct measurement. (I'm sure either method is fine for our purposes however.)
Amazon product ASIN B07T2XYCRY

Yep. I still use cylinders. I think it's partly because my first degree was in science and although we used both for different reasons, I always tended to prefer cylinders. It's also for the same reason you mention - I would prefer to introduce one possible source of error rather than two, and to buy scales and calibration weights that I would be happy to trust would cost far more than to buy cylinders I am happy to trust. Also if you want to get slightly silly about it technically weighing only works for pure H2O. Obviously other liquids have different molecular weights.

Ultimately like you I do sometimes wonder if it really matters much - the amounts we're dosing are small and within a few weeks the doser will be mechanically different anyway. Same point re my molecular weights comment.
 
Last edited:

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 9 25.0%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 6 16.7%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 5 13.9%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 10 27.8%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 9 25.0%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 6 16.7%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 2 5.6%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 3 8.3%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 1 2.8%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new