lighting an odd sized 175

OP
OP
BluegrassReef

BluegrassReef

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 23, 2008
Messages
657
Reaction score
0
Location
Kentucky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
the glass is on craigslist and it has a pic but it is only 3 pieces...don't know if it is worth it to have to get another piece of glass new and 1/2 " thick...I am still comtemplating(sp) it tho.
 

Wally1402

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Lauderdale
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a tank with close to the same dimensions. My tank is 48x36x24. I went with one Lumenarc reflector ( the full size one ) and a 400W XM bulb driven by a Galaxy ballast. The tank is only a month old so I can't give much feedback other than the light speads out well and looks nice.
 

cloakerpoked

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
553
Reaction score
28
Location
Fort Mill, SC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Was just at a local club meeting with Eric Bornaman as the speaker talking about feeding coral, and he said that their studies showed conclusively that corals couldn't use more light than at PAR readings of about 400...the rest has to come from feeding on rotifers, etc. Was very interesting lecture, and really made me think twice about my tank and the way I thought it should be set up.
 

shred5

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
6,404
Reaction score
4,766
Location
Waukesha, Wi
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
like i said i'm running 3 48" square tanks with 1 400watt luminarc over each, been doing it for years and it works great for the softies and lps.


I never said it can not be done. I have a friend who has a look down that is about 4' X 3' and lights it with 1 400 .. I just think there is more efficient ways. That is a lot of light missing the tank the higher you go because the spread of light gets wider. My friend does not even need to light his basement because of all the spill light. The ends of his tank are a little dim but would be fine for softies. I work for a company that is in the lighting business and we do lighting calcs almost every day to determine light levels. Also you would need a good reflector like he luminarc like you have to be truly successful.

Dave
 

cloakerpoked

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
553
Reaction score
28
Location
Fort Mill, SC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes, but 1 ballast+1 400w bulb+1 luminarc would still be a heck of a lot cheaper than 4 150w pendants or even regular mogul bulbs/sockets wired up to ballasts. Better from an electric efficiency perspective also. If the tank top was enclosed by a canopy and the inside was painted white, it would help some with the light spill, although certainly a lot of that light would still not make it to the tank. I'd be really interested in hearing if anyone who said they've done a 4'x4' tank with 1 400w bulb in a Luminarc (or any type of reflector for that matter) has done Par readings in their tank. If you have, or have the ability to, please post your results here...since without those readings, we really are making assumptions about how adequate this type of setup would be.
 

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 59 42.1%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 5 3.6%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 53 37.9%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 42 30.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new