Lighting suggestion for 10' mixed reef

Humongous

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Messages
51
Reaction score
74
Location
Boise Idaho
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm looking for suggestions as I've been thinking of changing my lighting. The tank is currently back on track for a year now after a crash in which I lost a fair amount of corals. All the corals, SPS, LPS, Softies are doing great even the gigantea is thriving. Some may ask why I would want to change if everything is thriving? The straight answer is power consumption. I'm running 3 x 400W Geisemann 17.5k Halides, 3 x 250W radiums (m80 ballast), 8x54W T5 for viewing and supplemental lighting and 6 x 110 VHO Actinic. I run the halides for only 5 hours per day each and the t5's are on for 12 hours.

To understand why I have all that, the tank is 10'L x 5'W x 30"H. The five feet of front to back is so enjoyable but lighting is a nightmare.

So back up a few months during the black Friday sales, I decided to buy the new Orphek Atlantik V2's. I bought as many as I could but I've realized that I flat out need more for coverage after testing one of the full size units. The Orphek is amazing but would cost me too much to fully light the tank so they are sitting unopened. At this point I'm going to sell them and try to come up with a better lighting solution.

I've spoke with Logan at Reefbreeders and the Photon lights look good and would cover the tank but I have no experience with them. I've also talked with Ecotech and they recommended 15 of the Gen4 pro XR30. Now don't get me wrong, the Radion is a great light but that price tag is completely out of my budget.

Final thoughts....

1. I love MH lighting! I don't like the power consumption.
2. I'm getting more accepting of LED technology now versus five years ago.
3. I'd really like to clean up the light rack and the WIRING( no pictures lol)

Love to hear peoples thoughts.
Thanks!!!!
 

Shanet

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
71
Reaction score
63
Location
Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Im buying/setting up for a 10' x 3' x 31 tank and will be using 5 x G4 Xr30 Pro Ecotechs, I use them on a 5' tank at the moment and love them. Like you say they are pricey but I think they are worth it.
 
OP
OP
H

Humongous

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Messages
51
Reaction score
74
Location
Boise Idaho
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are you only planning on 5 total for your new tank?
Im buying/setting up for a 10' x 3' x 31 tank and will be using 5 x G4 Xr30 Pro Ecotechs, I use them on a 5' tank at the moment and love them. Like you say they are pricey but I think they are worth it.
 

Shanet

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
71
Reaction score
63
Location
Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes 5 only, they cover a 24" x 24" area for each one. I intend to have the front 1' as sand bed only with low light LPS on it. This is how I have my 5 ' tank set up, it is 31"deep as well and I run the lights at 40 % with good growth on my LPS. I dont do SPS Yet.
 
OP
OP
H

Humongous

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Messages
51
Reaction score
74
Location
Boise Idaho
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would get 10 of the k7 pro from noopsyche.

That would kick butt.

2 rows of 5 perpendicular to the long dimension

Yes I think 10 would work well with 12 being the max I would go.

@Manose
You were saying 12 would be the max you would go. Do you think 15 would be too much? I have an 18" Gigantea that's been parked under a 400wMH for 2 years now. I'd rather err on the side of too much light and turn them down. Thoughts?
 

Manose

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
2,165
Reaction score
4,452
Location
Johnson City, Tn
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
@Manose
You were saying 12 would be the max you would go. Do you think 15 would be too much? I have an 18" Gigantea that's been parked under a 400wMH for 2 years now. I'd rather err on the side of too much light and turn them down. Thoughts?
It is never really to much light ;) cause we can adjust the intensity. I was thinking about $ spent but that is really not to much of a factor with the Noopsyche K7. The best thing about the K7 is they produce a shimmer like MH and Kessil so no worry about disco ball effect.
 
OP
OP
H

Humongous

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Messages
51
Reaction score
74
Location
Boise Idaho
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Manose
How high above the water line is suggested to get the best color blending?
It is never really to much light ;) cause we can adjust the intensity. I was thinking about $ spent but that is really not to much of a factor with the Noopsyche K7. The best thing about the K7 is they produce a shimmer like MH and Kessil so no worry about disco ball effect.
 

A. grandis

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
4,824
Reaction score
3,483
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
...
To understand why I have all that, the tank is 10'L x 5'W x 30"H. The five feet of front to back is so enjoyable but lighting is a nightmare.
...
Please keep this in your mind:
IF you need all that to have your system running as is, and I repeat IF, you would most likely need to invest a ton of money into LED systems and will most likely not achieve the exact SAME results you have now.
Meaning... the results (growth and coloration) that and you have will be DIFFERENT with the LEDs.
Is it worthy to go back to LEDs and spend that TON of money? Will it pay off in the long run? o_O
Normally you would have to invest lots of money with new LED fixtures to replace that much light for a big of a tank to keep the system alive!
What would I do?
I would rethink of all of what I've had over the system and see what I could do to make it work with halides and spend less electricity. Maybe you won't need 3 X400W and 3 X 250W plus all the VHOs!!!! Perhaps that was your mistake!
Pictures would help some!
Those are my thoughts.
Ps: your gigantea will hate you if you remove the halides. ;Wideyed
 

Skynyrd Fish

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
2,083
Reaction score
4,868
Location
Beverly Hills MI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If it were me I would add some more t5 and phase out the 110 vho. Power use and new bulbs are cheap compared to new LED lights. However with the right t5 and halide set up you could phase out halides as you got LED’s acquired. Post a pic. I want to see this beast.
 

jda

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
14,342
Reaction score
21,756
Location
Boulder, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a similar tank in the garage, but only 4' deep. To make a long story short, the MH is as good as it gets.

If you manage to save energy with LEDs, then you could have done with less Halides or T5s... there is no efficiency in lighting types, just different choices.

The Halides are enough to light the corals when they are on. Save some wattage and turn the T5s and VHOs off when they are on. I still have a pair of VHOs, but I have really good reflectors for them... if you don't have good reflectors you can get more mileage out of other T5s. I do realize that VHO Super Actinic are hard to beat, so if that is why you have them, then you gotta keep them since there is no viable substitute.

I am going to light my tank with 4x 400w 14k Hamiltons (probably, or maybe the Ushio or Giesemann) on the 20" reflectors and that is it - no T5s, no LEDs. 9 hours on/off. This is about $1.50 a day where I live, but there is no getting around the fact that large tanks are expensive. 20 Radions run at 100w is more wattage not to mention the $18,000 purchase and the additional heating costs. 14-16 Orpheks are expensive too. I am also not going to light the front too much, which is mostly sandy area... just keep the lights over the rock work.

I think that you could see some good savings if you just waited to turn the T5 and VHO on when the MH went off. 8-10 hours of light is enough.

If Idaho is anything like Colorado, you need to factor in your heaters having to work harder too. When you add all of this up, there is not going ot be much savings.

This might be cynical, but none of these companies will give you the right count if you ask them (EcoTech got close, but probably still 5-10 short). You saw this already a bit with the Orphek where they don't cover as much as they say when you compare them with what you have - the coverage areas are a joke when you compare them to a MH or T5 unit. Dr. Joshi is another good example where he is using 10x xr30s to replace 3x 400w Halides.
 

4FordFamily

Tang, Angel, and Wrasse Nerd!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2015
Messages
20,508
Reaction score
45,793
Location
Carmel, Indiana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would do 10 AI Hydra 52 HD
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 37 27.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 46 34.1%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 30 22.2%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 12 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.4%
Back
Top