- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
- Messages
- 31,035
- Reaction score
- 23,937
- Location
- tejas
- What state or country do you live in
- Alaska
Recap specific to OP question
Using examples given as feedback
Extended dosing risks habituation in the target, making you have to increase dose amount or % peroxide. It may or may not work but the risk of loss is so on file, if you're shown pertinent threads you'll see harm isn't a factor.
A list of known sensitives helps you determine dose approach
Don't dose preventatively without targets in place is my recommend. You're creating resistant targets that way. It took about fourteen years of work to be able to say that, though it's not in someone's published university study.
I took time to long term follow up with the dosers who were available, and we didn't have bad outcomes necessitating us to find things like micronutrient harm etc
From the hundreds of tanks on file we didn't follow up: click on avatar. Select find all threads to see the arc of the tank after the job. I did that years too no crashes
That's why trace element interaction is never mentioned in prep work for the jobs. But it's king risk presented here.
That risk was eliminated first year of work. It's still not factored anywhere, because we're not lacking great results depending on who's method is followed.
If you use peroxide dosing to win, like Troy did, quit using it after the target abates
Light power and spectrum are the first things we change in the clean condition: too much light and white light promulgates dinos tanks very often. (This should also cause an uproar based on recent threads here)
We remove the sandbed in other systems to sustain the fix depending on details. Peroxide is a tool don't make it the sole approach.
Using examples given as feedback
Extended dosing risks habituation in the target, making you have to increase dose amount or % peroxide. It may or may not work but the risk of loss is so on file, if you're shown pertinent threads you'll see harm isn't a factor.
A list of known sensitives helps you determine dose approach
Don't dose preventatively without targets in place is my recommend. You're creating resistant targets that way. It took about fourteen years of work to be able to say that, though it's not in someone's published university study.
I took time to long term follow up with the dosers who were available, and we didn't have bad outcomes necessitating us to find things like micronutrient harm etc
From the hundreds of tanks on file we didn't follow up: click on avatar. Select find all threads to see the arc of the tank after the job. I did that years too no crashes
That's why trace element interaction is never mentioned in prep work for the jobs. But it's king risk presented here.
That risk was eliminated first year of work. It's still not factored anywhere, because we're not lacking great results depending on who's method is followed.
If you use peroxide dosing to win, like Troy did, quit using it after the target abates
Light power and spectrum are the first things we change in the clean condition: too much light and white light promulgates dinos tanks very often. (This should also cause an uproar based on recent threads here)
We remove the sandbed in other systems to sustain the fix depending on details. Peroxide is a tool don't make it the sole approach.
Last edited:
