LR in SUmp = Nitrate Factory?

Rybren

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
1,549
Reaction score
2,064
Location
Ottawa, ON
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was reading through a thread in that other reefing forum and was surprised by people stating that Live Rock in a refugium are nitrate factories. I always thought that the opposite is true.

Here are some quotes:

What are you planning on having the rock in there do? You have a skimmer which equals export. You want to use Chaetomorpha for export as well. (There are far more effective macros around than Chaeto, but... ) Then you have rock, which does nothing but produce what you are trying to export. That is why bio-balls went out of vogue; rock = bio-balls.

What he really trying to say is the rock will produce more nitrate problems in your tank than beneficial pods being produced... there is no need for rocks in your fuge...or sand for that matter just a giant ball of cheato rolling around...

+1 to the rocks being a waste and counterproductive in that fuge. I would eliminate the rocks and run with the chaeto. It will provide plenty of refuge for pods to populate without causing a detritus trap and nitrate factory that will result from the rocks in there.

The larger misconception is that the rock rubble contributes to denitrification because it has holes in it. That is very unlikely as there is no mechanism for the bulk movement of water through the rock, at precisely the correct rate, which would be required for denitrification to occur. Certainly the conditions probably exist though the rubble is pretty small. (till the "pores" become clogged with glycocalyx; bacterial secretions,) However there is still the problem of bulk water movement. Sand beds operate differently, as they are "fluid" rather than solid rock...
...Looking at it logically, the DT produces, and the sump exports. Adding production to the sump, makes the system less efficient.

What are your thoughts on this subject?
 

saltyfilmfolks

Lights! Camera! Reef!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
28,739
Reaction score
40,625
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was reading through a thread in that other reefing forum and was surprised by people stating that Live Rock in a refugium are nitrate factories. I always thought that the opposite is true.

Here are some quotes:









What are your thoughts on this subject?
I don't believe its true at all. The science of why a canister filter is a factory quite different from waht happens in a rock. Having a stack of rubble or pile of rock and never cleaning, that's a different thing and Imo, mostly what happens in these reports. At least Id assume so.
 

bif24701

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 22, 2016
Messages
3,018
Reaction score
2,210
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am not a fan of rubble. I do have Live Rock in my 100 gallon sump and also MarinePure block. My nitrates are consistently low even though I have 5 tangs and feed well. The larger and more porous the rock the better it will perform denitrification.
 

saltyfilmfolks

Lights! Camera! Reef!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
28,739
Reaction score
40,625
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am not a fan of rubble. I do have Live Rock in my 100 gallon sump and also MarinePure block. My nitrates are consistently low even though I have 5 tangs and feed well. The larger and more porous the rock the better it will perform denitrification.
curious question, do you or do you have to "spring clean" the blocks for detritus? I would assume like everything in the tank it has to be maintained.
 

john.m.cole3

cyclOps
View Badges
Joined
Apr 1, 2015
Messages
2,626
Reaction score
2,179
Location
Lubbock, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Obce a
curious question, do you or do you have to "spring clean" the blocks for detritus? I would assume like everything in the tank it has to be maintained.
I just did a 6 month sump cleaning. I removed about 25 pounds of live rock. I also repeatedly dunked my brick and spheres in some tank water I removed during a WC hoping to keep the "pores" cleaned out. They look better.
 

Sabellafella

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 8, 2015
Messages
7,630
Reaction score
11,493
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
I was reading through a thread in that other reefing forum and was surprised by people stating that Live Rock in a refugium are nitrate factories. I always thought that the opposite is true.

Here are some quotes:









What are your thoughts on this subject?
To some degree i guess yea it could get out of hand but Nope, being lazy is a nitrate factory =)
 
OP
OP
Rybren

Rybren

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
1,549
Reaction score
2,064
Location
Ottawa, ON
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I really found their statements to be counter-intuitive. However, my intuition is rarely right :)

I wonder what @Randy Holmes-Farley has to say? I actually meant to post this in the Chemistry forum so that Randy would see it.
 

saltyfilmfolks

Lights! Camera! Reef!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
28,739
Reaction score
40,625
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm wondering why live rock in a sump is supposed to have a different effect than live rock in the display?
an add. One of the reasons why folks seem to opt for the marine pure bloks, its supposed to have more surface area for bacteria so you can use less and save space. But I have zero experience with it.
 

Bluefish9

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
286
Reaction score
343
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Other than doing a little "dusting" with a spare powerhead or a turkey baster, I've never truly cleaned any rock before. In my sump I use marinepure spheres that I contain in a plastic basket... every few months ill take the basket out and give it a vigorous shake in some tank water from a water change. Thats really all I find to be necessary.
 

Sm51498

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
437
Reaction score
443
Location
Raleigh, NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This whole nitrate factory thing is silly. shouldn't we want a nitrate factory? to extend the metaphor, a nitrate factory must assemble nitrate from parts, ammonia and nitrite, it can't be summoned from thin air. we should prize the efficient and fast conversion of those things as they are poisonous.
 

Jongalt26

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 13, 2016
Messages
281
Reaction score
143
Location
Philly
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Whats a more effective macro export than chaeto ?

I have a lot of LR in my sump (and marinepure, chaeto), it's been there for over 6 months or so (needed to breakdown and set-up another tank) I have 1 ppm nitrates so im curious how these are a nitrate factory.
 

brandon429

what, exactly, are you doing in your avatar
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
31,035
Reaction score
23,923
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sm5 I read that factory claim differently. I see what you are saying, though. Your take (if im reading right) infers that without the extra added surface area live rock, we'd have ammonia backup but without that sump LR things were often just fine. The reason for the factory claim, is that the added surface area of live rock is catching and holding for additional breakdown the detritus that a bare bottom system would've otherwise piled in the corner for the keeper to siphon out. its also stating the NNR abilities of live rock are so overplayed that adding some causes nitrates, not reduces them, more often than not.

I think Randy and others have some measurable NNR by making a large ratios of live rock exist in a system already fairly controlled with export or uptake anyway. LR wasn't that powerful of a NNR system as was claimed in the 90s or carbon dosers/ats wouldn't be all the rage to clean up nitrate. same for deep sand beds. all the stuff claimed to reduce nitrate in the 90s turned out to be catch-and-holders of protein, which leaks into ammonia and produces more nitrate since it couldn't be exported. these are nutrient sinks by and large, not nutrient reducers, due to excessive surface area we used that we couldn't clean.
 
Last edited:

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top