LumenBar first thoughts

PhantomHalo

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
418
Reaction score
89
Location
Battle Creek, MI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Warning, my long review of my LumenBars as well as touching on the Photon V2+’s. Today I got the last of my LumenBars installed. I have two 60” (1x Royal Ice, 1xHigh Octane UV) and three 24” (all UV/Blue). I also have the 3x 24” Photon V2+ lighting my 300 gal DD. The Photons are running front to back. The two 60” are running across the front of the tank angled down and back to cover the front of the tank and front of the rocks. Two of the 24” are on each side of the tank angled in to get the sides of the rocks. Finally, one 24” in the back angled toward the front.
My hope was to eliminate as much shading as possible while keeping par relatively even throughout the tank (on each level of rock work). Adding the three 24” LumenBars added about 30 par throughout the tank. They definitely look good, but not too blue at all. The 60” bars added about the same although the are not angled all the way back like I’d like. So most of that is angled down and the first quarter of the tank. (See pics)
My main lights have a bit more white than I’d like, but I’m still acclimating the corals and dialing them in. I do have the dimmers, but I’m still waiting on my GHL controller. It should be here Tuesday. It will be nice to have them ramp up too instead of just on and off. So far though, build quality is very good. (Some glue squeezed out of seal and exposed onto the led as shown in pics.) However, the aluminum frame is very nice. The mounting system is pretty good too. I just wish they had better factory options for linking them together the way I have the Photons configured. (That is a Photon critique, not LumenBars.) With some aluminum from Lowe’s and some drilling I made it work.
Over all my corals are already starting to color up more. Had a bad batch of water that bleached or almost killed and killed most of my sps. Long story, but also I had the Bozily led panels on there with one panel having half the lights out. They were set by my eye instead of with a par meter. Once I got a par meter, I was starving my corals due to lack of light. Even at max power and 10” above the water I was barely getting 200 par 6” under the water. So now the bleached ones are starting to get some color back. So maybe I went a little overboard on the lights. Lol It is worth it though. I have the entire tank covered, at every angle, with blue and UV without my main lights on.
I know there are reviews on the Photons already, but they are great lights! Much better than the Bozily lights! Haha The remote is pretty easy to use. Very touchy, but it’s nice to not have to use my phone to control the lights. Setup is pretty simple for ramp up and down. Just wish there was a computer app that you could build your schedule and send it or upload it to the lights and make small adjustments with the remote. I have them mounted about 13” above the water, but still have 250 par in the middle and about 200 par 8” left and right at about 55% peak on the main channels. I may have to just raise them up more and increase the intensity. However, I am almost as high as I can get with the cables they sent in my hood. I will have to figure something else out if it becomes a problem. Finally, the disco. Lol When I had them down at 7-8” above the water it was definitely there. Now, not so much. After adding the LumenBars, pretty much nonexistent.

38E2BD54-5A69-47F2-AB53-9D56A07771C4.jpeg 0E30319B-39A3-4196-99E4-E5CA6DC1C9A9.jpeg E9AB33EE-1406-4E6A-9633-619CD943E02B.jpeg 31FB8515-BEF1-416F-9EB6-9BA30B7AB9C7.jpeg
Glue on led-
CC7788A5-1AD1-41AB-BE9D-1A32A355749C.jpeg 41FB0AEA-9E5F-4667-9FB5-57EB5958E88A.jpeg 37AAA703-B8E1-4282-BB6E-949D255ABBC6.jpeg 9F5FAE53-4D6C-49C5-8756-2CB87EC35438.jpeg

Rear light bar is now up front- 7396F651-02A7-4C2F-891D-FA81D09300BB.jpeg
DFE79ADA-650B-437E-B806-D6278FE3A46D.jpeg EE9E251A-9702-4C48-9058-C767900A83B3.jpeg 24889363-1C1F-4B45-B1B4-3A00F06A0D23.jpeg 677EAB43-A2BB-48D2-8C97-BBD220172A2C.jpeg 614F8A02-1E52-4199-89E8-505E90517062.jpeg 63918601-367D-44FE-B442-D2FC093E83C6.jpeg D074E806-0339-4C23-B35E-90FAE75393BD.jpeg 6F3E3925-9FCB-4AAD-9480-D979D3414BBB.jpeg
Light bars only-
F110587E-92FA-4D81-BDA4-CBF4A1BB96C3.jpeg FEA5765B-266C-4B14-AB68-AFA1BB79709F.jpeg B1D02D4A-86E9-494E-A6A8-79461D7E26B3.jpeg
 
Last edited:

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
5,723
Reaction score
3,520
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
but also I had the Bozily led panels on there with one panel having half the lights out. They were set by my eye instead of with a par meter. Once I got a par meter, I was starving my corals due to lack of light. Even at max power and 10” above the water I was barely getting 200 par 6” under the water.

Bit off topic but failures should have a bit of documentation:
When you said set by eye, I assume the panels weren't at full power. What was the output?
You had 1/2 panel out, how long did you run it before it failed?
How many panels?

Dimensions of tank?

sorry for the geeky questions..
 
OP
OP
PhantomHalo

PhantomHalo

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
418
Reaction score
89
Location
Battle Creek, MI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Bit off topic but failures should have a bit of documentation:
When you said set by eye, I assume the panels weren't at full power. What was the output?
You had 1/2 panel out, how long did you run it before it failed?
How many panels?

Dimensions of tank?

sorry for the geeky questions..

No worries! They were the 300 watt panels. I had the blues set to about 180 and whites around 15%. I set this tank up in November and have been running them 8 hours a day since then, but only 6 hours on full (my settings) power with one hour ramp up and down and moonlights on for 4 hours at night (blues set to 8%). I had three panels on a 72”x36” foot print tank.
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
5,723
Reaction score
3,520
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Actually 300W is their name.. Panels are about 100 some watts..If ones goes off one of their hort. variants..
Power Consumption: 65W±5%
 
OP
OP
PhantomHalo

PhantomHalo

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
418
Reaction score
89
Location
Battle Creek, MI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Actually 300W is their name.. Panels are about 100 some watts..If ones goes off one of their hort. variants..

Well, that would be why I was starving the corals! Tricky naming. Lol To be honest, the tank was supposed to just be a softy/predator tank and I didn’t care too much about the lights. However, then I found good deals on some beautiful higher end corals and then well, we all know how that goes. So didn’t recheck the lights. Just thought they were 300 watt and had plenty of light/spectrum. My last reef tank was metal halide. So now I am learning about all the LED tech. Thanks for the clarification!
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
5,723
Reaction score
3,520
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well, that would be why I was starving the corals! Tricky naming. Lol To be honest, the tank was supposed to just be a softy/predator tank and I didn’t care too much about the lights. However, then I found good deals on some beautiful higher end corals and then well, we all know how that goes. So didn’t recheck the lights. Just thought they were 300 watt and had plenty of light/spectrum. My last reef tank was metal halide. So now I am learning about all the LED tech. Thanks for the clarification!

Yea they post some very unrealistic PAR data as well, so thanks for the real measurements (though expected w/ the low power output).


BIGGER SIZE WITH LARGER ILLUMINATION - LED grow light's size:22 x 11.8 x 0.7”. Equipped with 338LEDs, this grow lamp replaces traditional 300W HPS/MH while consuming only 60±5%W, 96.7% energy saving. Double area of illumination than other 300W indoor plant lights. Perfect for 3’ X 3’ growing area at 18 inches height!

65W will never replace 300W MH unless it has no reflector..

Not even close though w/ exact placement it's a bit possible in a very small area.
relassy2.JPG


Your height would be 16"
Bosley, Relassy, ect..

sorry, I'm done and thanks..
 
OP
OP
PhantomHalo

PhantomHalo

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
418
Reaction score
89
Location
Battle Creek, MI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yea they post some very unrealistic PAR data as well, so thanks for the real measurements (though expected w/ the low power output).


65W will never replace 300W MH unless it has no reflector..

Not even close though w/ exact placement it's a bit possible in a very small area.
relassy2.JPG


Your height would be 16"
Bosley, Relassy, ect..

sorry, I'm done and thanks..

Lol not even close! I had them at full power, after I found out what my par was (110ish), and was barely getting 200 par just under the water surface. Definitely not as advertised.
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
5,723
Reaction score
3,520
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lol not even close! I had them at full power, after I found out what my par was (110ish), and was barely getting 200 par just under the water surface. Definitely not as advertised.

Yea advertising is a slippery slope..
just for fun
AI Prime fuge light. Note huge falloff past sweet center spot..
Doesn't take much.
Not defending them but it's "possible" in a very limited spot w/ perfect meter placement to get that.
Doesn't do anyone any good though overall..

Since PAR meters measure all the visible light (in theory) equally, color of light doesn't matter much.
In the AI case some >700nm may be present and even the best par meters fall off a bit on the blue side.
24x24" square

Shows the value in using a par meter personally.. ;)
Credit for the image to BRS.
aifuge.JPG
 

How much do you care about having a display FREE of wires, pumps and equipment?

  • Want it squeaky clean! Wires be danged!

    Votes: 143 40.7%
  • A few things are ok with me!

    Votes: 176 50.1%
  • No care at all! Bring it on!

    Votes: 32 9.1%
Back
Top