Maintaining a 120 reef

Casey Gore

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
83
Reaction score
46
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am really on the fence about pulling the trigger on a 90 to 120 tank. I have always had a nano reef but I am really wanting to get some larger fish and do more. I know it would be funn but making a jump that big is giving me alot of anxiety. Compared to a 10 gallon nano how much harder is it to keep large reef tanks? I know I can afford it, its just such a large object and I keep trying to keep myself positive with all the cool things i could keep and how nice it would look.
 

AllSignsPointToFish

"No Longer The Guy Without FaceBook"
View Badges
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
5,851
Reaction score
9,613
Location
Gulf Breeze, Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Actually, I think larger tanks are easier to keep because the increased water volume allows for more stable water chemistry. Also, since dosing volumes are generally larger for larger tanks, automating dosing is probably a little easier than on a small tank. I'd bet it's pretty easy to get the water chemistry out of whack in a small tank just by misdosing an additive.

I honestly don't know how you nano reef guys do it!
 

MaiReef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
1,140
Location
Albany, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Welcome to R2R!
A larger tank is easier because of the stability. Bad example but, a fish dies in a small tank, your whole tank could die. Same thing happens in a large tank and it may just be eaten or otherwise disposed of before it harms the tank. I recommend a sump if you go that size to hide things and hold items like heaters, a skimmer, or a refugium.
 

SPR1968

No, it wasn’t expensive dear....
View Badges
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
20,109
Reaction score
119,310
Location
Nottinghamshire England
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As already said, personally I think ‘normal’ size large tanks are easier to maintain as far as water parameters go and if you’ve managed a nano I wouldn’t worry to much at all.

Obviously if something goes wrong it can be very expensive so you possibly need to be very aware of your tanks requirements and have maybe backups in place or fail safes.

And welcome to R2R it’s great to have you with us!
 

moz71

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 25, 2018
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
1,248
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Welcome!! To give you my thought I will tell you I had an 18 gallon and a 125 gallon. I shut down the 18 gallon!!! I just couldn't keep up with it fast enough meaning stability and nitrates (associated algae). There is just so much more forgiveness in larger tanks. The only bad things is the expense and if something does go wrong it is a much bigger project for example I needed to home all my fish to go fishless for a brook outbreak and that was not easy .
 
OP
OP
C

Casey Gore

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
83
Reaction score
46
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Welcome!! To give you my thought I will tell you I had an 18 gallon and a 125 gallon. I shut down the 18 gallon!!! I just couldn't keep up with it fast enough meaning stability and nitrates (associated algae). There is just so much more forgiveness in larger tanks. The only bad things is the expense and if something does go wrong it is a much bigger project for example I needed to home all my fish to go fishless for a brook outbreak and that was not easy .
Why is it so hard to find canopies for large tanks?
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.9%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 42 34.4%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.1%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top