Manual home testing vs ICP

Biff0rz

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 9, 2020
Messages
2,301
Reaction score
1,352
Location
Michigan (SE)
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
I've been sending out some ICP's and thought it'd be worth doing some manual tests at the same time to compare the accuracy. There's a lot that goes into the accuracy of both testing measures but I am at least consistent w my manual tests and try to do things as accurate as possible. These are the results of my most latest (5/8 sample, 5/19 results) ICP/manuals at the same time, but all prior tests are pretty much the same which speaks to my personal methods in manual testing (or so I like to think lol)

Here's what I found-

ParamManual ResultICP ResultManual Brand/Type
NO325.228.33Hanna / Oceamo-MS
PO40.170.124Hanna / Oceamo-MS
Alk #18.238.22Hanna / Oceamo-MS
Alk #28.408.22Alkatronic / Oceamo-MS
Alk #38.428.22Trident / Oceamo-MS
Ca #1450409API tritration / Oceamo-MS
Ca #2421409Trident / Oceamo-MS
Sg #11.0261 / 34.6434.4Tropic Marin Hydrometer / Oceamo-MS
Sg #232.134.4Hanna Tester / Oceamo-MS

I'm pretty happy with everything overall. Particularly happy with the TM Hydrometer :)

Anyways, I thought this was cool information and will continue to track it.
 

Gumbies R Us

God, Bouldering, and Reefing
View Badges
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
29,691
Reaction score
52,505
Location
North Georgia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you for sharing this comparison!
 

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 15 33.3%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 3 6.7%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 20 44.4%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 14 31.1%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new