Marco rocks pros and cons ?

Yanir34

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 14, 2019
Messages
993
Reaction score
1,012
Location
Israel
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hello , anyone can share his experience with this rocks ?
 

ShakeyGizzard

Southern Dude
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2023
Messages
7,767
Reaction score
30,922
Location
West Central Georgia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
your going to get a lot of folks giving positive and negative posts on this. Dry rock has a lot of positive things going on and some negative. You can design and make your aquascape to what ever you desire, and it will be solid and stable (no falling apart) . a con of dry rock is your cycle will be slightly longer, your ugly stage can be more intense. Along with slightly longer time until stable. With that being said, you also have the ability to control unwanted parasites, algae, and other unwanted wildlife. Live rock just has more biome already on the rock, which aids in the tank cycle and speed to maturity. If you are looking for an exact style and shape aquascape, it will be tough to do with live rock. When you add live rock you also add what ever is on the rock, if you see those posts about "what is this" they used live rock. You can add some of the unwanted parasites, crabs, corals, anemones, algae, etc. that came on the live rock.
 

DmitryB

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 26, 2026
Messages
511
Reaction score
399
Location
Hunter, NY
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I initially purchased a lot of LifeRock, then saw Marco's in person and I must say it looks much more realistic than LifeRock. I wish I'd gone with Marco's to supplement my fully live rock.
 

Project1004

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 6, 2014
Messages
515
Reaction score
593
Location
Villa Rica Ga
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’ve used dry Marco rocks very first time I got into saltwater hobby.

Having Marco rocks for close to 10yrs, I didn’t start with Marco rocks this time around.

My personal opinion of Marco rock are:

-it’s ugly and bulky. It’s hard to aquascape with.

But most concerning to me was that it was so porous. So it takes “forever” for it to be filled with whatever is needed to be filled into those holes and gaps. And it’s not always good stuff that gets trapped in there. Guaranty forever detritus..
So it will take long time for it to get to maturity.
That’s my main reason I went with cribsea rocks that are more natural looking and less porous. I think it was much easier to get it to settle.

I only have old photos I took out from the laptop. -.-;

But the rocks were pretty much stack and be done type.

My old 120.

IMG_5471.jpeg


IMG_5472.jpeg


IMG_5474.jpeg


IMG_5473.jpeg
 

ShakeyGizzard

Southern Dude
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2023
Messages
7,767
Reaction score
30,922
Location
West Central Georgia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If you are aiming for a more particular shape or style aquascape, you will need to break the larger dry rock up to be able to make your scape the way you want it. there is no limit to the shape, size or design when using dry rock. My first tank used "live" rock from the LFS. yes, it comes with increased biome levels, but every time you add a frag, snail, crab or a fish, you add to your biome.
 

Waters

"...in perfect isolation, here behind my wall."
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
9,368
Reaction score
20,904
Location
Mentor, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I start all my tanks with marco dry rock.....sometimes seeded with one or two pieces of live rock in the sump. I like the ease of aquascaping and building using the light porous rock.....plus I know what is going in the tank....at least in the beginning lol.
 

ARE YOU READY TO CONFESS TO CRAZIEST, DUMBEST, FUNNIEST THING YOU’VE EVER DONE IN REEFING?

  • Yeah, I'll confess! (Share your story in the comments!)

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Nah, I'll keep mine a secret...(Don't be like that, share with the class!)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new