Max Size for a "Nano" Tank

BlazinNano

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
1,489
Location
AltamonteSprings, FL
What state or country do you live in
Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok there is always confusion on what is the max size of a nano.
So I figure we can get everyone to list what they think and then we can take a vote.
Now first thing do we include the sump as part of the system or just the display tank?
What I mean by that is if you 20 gallon with a 20 gallon sump, is it still a 20 gallon or a 40 gallon?


So what does everyone think is the MAX size for a nano?
 
Here are my 2cents:

Nano classification is only relevant to the display part of the tank because that is where you are limited in terms of coral/fish space.

30g and under is the max for a "Nano" classification
 
Here are my 2cents:

Nano classification is only relevant to the display part of the tank because that is where you are limited in terms of coral/fish space.

30g and under is the max for a "Nano" classification

This exactly what my Fiance said when I asked her. I know I should listen to her more. Now if we make it 30 gallons that would excluded the Red Sea Max 34 gallon.

I have heard under 37g

I know you can order a 37 gallon from AGA but I have never seen one.
 
Having the biggest nano is like being the tallest little person... The smaller the better:D
 
34 is what I have always heard and saw on every site... I considered my solana 34 a nano... But I did go from a 500 to it...:p
 
24x24x24 totally no space at all
 
I'd say under 40 gallons is nano. Once you get to 40 its actually a decent sized tank of course it is and will always be subjective.
 
They are ALL nano in my opinion... no tank is bigger than a billionth of the ocean ;)
jk man I would say it depends on the display "I" would consider any tank less than 1.5x2x2 a "nano"
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW IMPORTANT ARE FISH TO MAKING A REEF TANK FEEL COMPLETE?

  • Essential! A reef needs fish movement and personality

    Votes: 47 66.2%
  • Very important, but one or two fish may be enough

    Votes: 7 9.9%
  • Optional... a coral-only reef can feel completely finished

    Votes: 2 2.8%
  • I actually prefer a coral-and-invertebrate-only system

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It depends on the tank’s size, style, or purpose

    Votes: 11 15.5%
  • I’ve kept a fishless reef (details in the comments)

    Votes: 3 4.2%
  • Well...it's complicated... (answer in the comments)

    Votes: 1 1.4%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new