MP40 or MP 10

recess62

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 24, 2015
Messages
919
Reaction score
689
Location
Pound Ridge, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Which would you use on the back wall of a 18 inch deep 90 gal? Looking to get some better front to back circulation. Presently using 2mp 49s on opposite side walls
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
8,968
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What are the tank's dimensions? If it's a standard ninety "on it's side" then maybe it's 48" x 24" x 18"H?

The mp40 is good for about 24" from the pump in every direction, so hypothetically you should have it covered pretty well with two mp40's.

Can you show a pic of your tank?
 
OP
OP
recess62

recess62

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 24, 2015
Messages
919
Reaction score
689
Location
Pound Ridge, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Tank is 18 inches front to back 24 inches tall. With my present rock structure I am having difficulties with getting random water motion. Thought by adding a powerhead to the back I could get a more random flow pattern. Sorry for being he crummy pic

IMG_0267.JPG
 

redfishbluefish

Stay Positive, Stay Productive
View Badges
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
12,306
Reaction score
25,427
Location
Sayreville, NJ
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a five foot 90 gallon that's 18 inches deep as well and I've recently started playing with adding more flow by adding more powerheads (Dana Riddle's MACNA talk made me do it). My two main powerheads are two MP40's on either end. The additional powerheads I just added are a Jebao PP15.....way too powerful....and a Tunze 6015. The Jebao was too powerful to face pointing out, so that is currently parallel with the back wall. The Tunze is shooting straight towards the front glass, and if anything is slightly underpowered. I'd like to try a Jebao PP4, but I'm not sure if it would hold on my 1/2 inch glass. I decided to go with "regular" powerheads instead of MP's because I can hide them behind my rockwork. Here's a crappy picture I just took and you can't see these two added powerheads.

 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
8,968
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Having your powerheads facing each other is very often not the optimal way to run them since they end up, at least in part, where one is working against the other.

I would consider moving both pumps you have onto the back wall. This suits the vortech flow better if you can make it work.

Is there any chance your rock structure can either accommodate one pump on each side as is, or if not maybe can the rocks even be moved 6" or so to the left to help?
 

Rarend99

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
92
Reaction score
29
Location
Northern California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I ran a 90 standard just like you with two mp40s on the side walls and one mp10 on the back right side because my overflow was offcenter on the right. It worked great. Key is to make sure they're all the same level so the flows run into each other
 

Salty1962

Wrasse and SPS Lover
View Badges
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
8,484
Reaction score
7,640
Location
Charlotte, NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IMO, 2x MP40s on the back wall would suite you better. I used 2 on my previous standard 90. It will give you greater random flow and if you use a controller, you'd be able to control even better. I believe in too much than not enough:) You can always dial it down if it's too much but a 10 is tuff to dial up. If you don't have both, I have a MP40 WQD for sale;)
 
OP
OP
recess62

recess62

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 24, 2015
Messages
919
Reaction score
689
Location
Pound Ridge, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Having your powerheads facing each other is very often not the optimal way to run them since they end up, at least in part, where one is working against the other.

I would consider moving both pumps you have onto the back wall. This suits the vortech flow better if you can make it work.

Is there any chance your rock structure can either accommodate one pump on each side as is, or if not maybe can the rocks even be moved 6" or so to the left to help?


I can definitely try this. Gonna try tomorrow :)
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 44 35.5%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.8%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.5%
Back
Top