- Joined
- Jan 8, 2014
- Messages
- 15,906
- Reaction score
- 50,359
Black hornetsI want to know too...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Black hornetsI want to know too...
SpiffyBlack hornets
So am I missing something? Please explain 13 for me it has the most votes. It was the only one that didn’t have any clarity. Is it some special creation with camera settings. All the other ones have clear focus. Maybe I’m missing something 84 other people saw.
Maybe it’s a lights out picture
Are pics of the month able to edit the photos to "POP" more color? Or do they have to be natural? I think they should have to be legit, natural photos without any editing.
Post-production editing is certainly allowed, and in fact, encouraged. Although I understand the sentiment of your message, this is a photography competition and we're looking for the best photograph.
Gotcha. So in reality it has nothing to do with how the coral actually looks. You can add as much color as you want because it makes for a nicer picture. So you can basically take a drap coral, make it completely different colors, add color where there isn't any, ect....
Sounds like a Photoshop contest in a certain regard, lol. But I understand the guidlines now. Thanks for the info.
Looked at it with iPad Pro and my computer.Pics are totally different on a cell phone compared to a larger computer monitor.
Looked at it with iPad Pro and my computer.
13 has none of these qualities. It looks very blurry out of focus and like it was taken in the dark with a bad camera. I just don’t understand why people are voting for it when there are some really nice pictures to vote for other than that one. If it had been spruced up or a nice clean shot than it would be an awesome picture. I think people are voting for it because it probably is a really cool zoa and not voting for a quality photo which I would assume is the premise of a photo of the month contest.That's not it at all.
There's a difference in altering a photo to make a coral look nice to sell it and editing a photo so it's optimal viewing pleasure.
A brown coral edited to look some usual color probably still won't win. A blue hippo tang edited to be pink and gold isn't gonna win either. A good photo edited for crop/center; color correction or sprucing it up to make it presentable is totally acceptable and encouraged IMO.
I've seen many good shots that didn't win because they didn't take the time to edit to make simple edits to make it stand out.
13 has none of these qualities. It looks very blurry out of focus and like it was taken in the dark with a bad camera. I just don’t understand why people are voting for it when there are some really nice pictures to vote for other than that one. If it had been spruced up or a nice clean shot than it would be an awesome picture. I think people are voting for it because it probably is a really cool zoa and not voting for a quality photo which I would assume is the premise of a photo of the month contest.
Well I guess I just won’t get it and that’s ok. Not trying to be a jerk either. When I think of a photo of the month contest I think about color, clarity, focus, and some spiffing up is ok. I just don’t see that in that one compared to all the other ones.
Like me or hate me for it just my opinion.
Looks clear on my phone, galaxy S7. Pic looks amazing and by the votes I'd say most agree. Also, maybe people are trying to be hardcore about the pic itself. Maybe others just like the way the coral looks? Its a fun contest nonetheless.Made no difference viewing on my phone but it's a galaxy note 8 so it has a fantastic screen.
All the photos look the same as computer actually resolution on my phone is better then my computer lol.
You may have a point for other people' phones but I doubt it's a quality is vs. that zoa looks cool kind of thing.
Later back to my tank lol