Opinions On White Balance Setting.

143gadgets

Mr. Meticulous
View Badges
Joined
Sep 12, 2006
Messages
6,006
Reaction score
157
Location
D.C.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was playing around with my WB settings and thought these came out pretty cool. Almost identical to how they look in person. I'm running two 24w Uri Super Actinic T5s. Wanted to know what u all thought.

Graffiti Aussie (Slowest growth of any acan I have ever had)
GrafittiAussie.jpg


Ric
Ric98.jpg


Tyree Blood Red Eyes Cyphastrea
TC1.jpg
 
Looks good. How did you set the WB or what setting did you use?
 
Hmm I think you need a Canon...
 
I usually just play with the WB in RAW, but your pics looks pretty good to me. I do find this hard as you want to represent the true colors of the coral, not necessarily what they look like under actinic/20K lighting.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHICH SUPPOSEDLY EASY CORAL HAS GIVEN YOU THE MOST TROUBLE?

  • Zoanthids or palythoas

    Votes: 15 23.1%
  • Mushrooms or Ricordea

    Votes: 12 18.5%
  • Green star polyps

    Votes: 8 12.3%
  • Xenia

    Votes: 8 12.3%
  • Leather corals

    Votes: 8 12.3%
  • Duncan or candy cane corals

    Votes: 14 21.5%
  • Birdsnest or Montipora digitata

    Votes: 16 24.6%
  • None—mine have lived up to the reputation

    Votes: 4 6.2%
  • Other (tell us which one)

    Votes: 3 4.6%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new