Hi, I have been wondering this for a few months, and I mean this in as an objective/scientific sense as possible.
Why is there a bias against using 2700K to 3500K lighting for macroalgae?
Given two bulbs, one that's 3000K and one that's 6500K:
This is not even bringing up the fact that horticulture industries use warm light for various setups, which lends that warm spectrums could be effective for refugiums as well.
Is there some reason we don't want yellow/green/orange spectrum light in macroalgae-based refugiums? Excess heat? Waste of power/money?
Secondly, is increased wattage in the red spectrum damaging to macroalgae? Is it because the ocean does not absorb much warm light at depth?
Curious to hear your thoughts. Thanks
Why is there a bias against using 2700K to 3500K lighting for macroalgae?
Given two bulbs, one that's 3000K and one that's 6500K:
- Let's say this hypothetical 3000K bulb uses more power (watts) than the 6500K bulb, and
- let's say the 3000K bulb has the same level of photons hitting the blue spectrum as the 6500K.
This is not even bringing up the fact that horticulture industries use warm light for various setups, which lends that warm spectrums could be effective for refugiums as well.
Is there some reason we don't want yellow/green/orange spectrum light in macroalgae-based refugiums? Excess heat? Waste of power/money?
Secondly, is increased wattage in the red spectrum damaging to macroalgae? Is it because the ocean does not absorb much warm light at depth?
Curious to hear your thoughts. Thanks
