RO water has critically high silicates

reefinusa

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Location
Montana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I just got back my first ICP test. The most concerning thing I think I saw was the level of silocates in the RO water. It was at 16146 µg/l (reference .001 µg/l). I dont know a lot on the chemistry of water, but that seems crazy high. Like its an error high. The weird thing is that my tank water is also high at 381.5 µg/l. I do have diatoms on blthe back of tank and on powerheads and loc-line. Im not sure how.to proceed. I did just switch out my filters in my RO bulk reef supply 4 stage system, but I can't remember if it was before or after the test. Everything else on the RO sample was undetectable.

Some other concerning numbers in the tank water:

Stated as Above Normal on test:
Nickel: 5.91 µg/l - Ideal value: 0.47

Stated at Normal on test:
Zinc: 5.62 µg/l - Ideal value: 1.89 µg/l
Tin: 2.52 µg/l - Ideal value: 0.47 µg/l
Copper: 3.94 µg/l - Ideal value: 0.47 µg/l
Alluminum: 44.97 µg/l - Ideal value: 0.09 µg/l

I have been getting some new acro frag die off. Looking for advise on how to a) fox my RO situation, and b) lower some of these metal numbers.

I will look for any screws or things of that nature in the tank immediately. I did recently add two bioblocks into my tank for additional bio filter for the tank. It is a bare bottom tank. I have also bought new wet sides for my mp40s but havent installed them yet. I'll do that immediately. How harmful are the numbers I'm having to my inhabitants?!? :(

Thanks!
Chris
 
Last edited:

Subsea

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
8,925
Reaction score
11,554
Location
Austin, Tx
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I will bump this for you.

For me, silicates are not a problem. I dose silicates for my sponges. It comes in with the Middle Trinity groundwater.
 
Last edited:

BZOFIQ

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 31, 2014
Messages
6,259
Reaction score
4,933
Location
NYC
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
I had initial high silicates from the use of Siporax in the sump. Subsequent tests showed very low levels.

My sponges took off like weeds 😁
 
OP
OP
R

reefinusa

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Location
Montana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
he silicate level over 16 ppm suggests the ro water would not likely have been 0 ppm tds, or the icp is in error.
@Randy Holmes-Farley - Thanks for the quick response!

It very well might have been that - I did have around 10ppm before changing filters out on my RO system (and I don't remember if I sent this in pre/post that) - that said, I might have just ordered additional canisters for additional di filtration! :P

How concerning are those other parameters I stated? I might have done an emergency order for some MetaSorb and Rowaphos (along with Neophos to help increase phosphate if necessary) to help :# Maybe I'm chasing/worried about numbers too much?
 

Subsea

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
8,925
Reaction score
11,554
Location
Austin, Tx
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I just got back my first ICP test. The most concerning thing I think I saw was the level of silocates in the RO water. It was at 16146 µg/l (reference .001 µg/l). I dont know a lot on the chemistry of water, but that seems crazy high. Like its an error high. The weird thing is that my tank water is also high at 381.5 µg/l. I do have diatoms on blthe back of tank and on powerheads and loc-line. Im not sure how.to proceed. I did just switch out my filters in my RO bulk reef supply 4 stage system, but I can't remember if it was before or after the test. Everything else on the RO sample was undetectable.

Some other concerning numbers in the tank water:

Stated as Above Normal on test:
Nickel: 5.91 µg/l - Ideal value: 0.47

Stated at Normal on test:
Zinc: 5.62 µg/l - Ideal value: 1.89 µg/l
Tin: 2.52 µg/l - Ideal value: 0.47 µg/l
Copper: 3.94 µg/l - Ideal value: 0.47 µg/l
Alluminum: 44.97 µg/l - Ideal value: 0.09 µg/l

I have been getting some new acro frag die off. Looking for advise on how to a) fox my RO situation, and b) lower some of these metal numbers.

I will look for any screws or things of that nature in the tank immediately. I did recently add two bioblocks into my tank for additional bio filter for the tank. It is a bare bottom tank. I have also bought new wet sides for my mp40s but havent installed them yet. I'll do that immediately. How harmful are the numbers I'm having to my inhabitants?!? :(

Thanks!
Chris
Chris,
I don’t chase numbers and I don’t believe your test results.

Do you really have 4 ppm of Copper in your display tank.
 
OP
OP
R

reefinusa

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Location
Montana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Chris,
I don’t chase numbers and I don’t believe your test results.

Do you really have 4 ppm of Copper in your display tank.
I mean, I hope not! We do have a lot of metals in our well water - so maybe. MY tds on my ro was reading around 10 before I changed it. I also have a sediment filter before any water hits the house that needed replacing too.
 
OP
OP
R

reefinusa

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Location
Montana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I mean, I hope not! We do have a lot of metals in our well water - so maybe. MY tds on my ro was reading around 10 before I changed it. I also have a sediment filter before any water hits the house that needed replacing too.
@Subsea - Also, I always read 3.94 µg/l as 3.94 part per bilion (ppb)
 

wally311

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5
Reaction score
5
Location
Kansas City
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I use an RODI filtration system. In my experience, when TDS gets above 0 the ICP tests will usually show silicates creeping up. This usually means its time to change the DI resin. New DI resin equals no more silicates.
 

BryanM

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 27, 2024
Messages
7,651
Reaction score
9,359
Location
Morgan Hill
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Well water is always a gamble, probably should be tested, and then a RODI system designed to deal with what your working with needs to happen.

If you really have copper this is not good. Essentially zero is the only acceptable number.
 

Subsea

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
8,925
Reaction score
11,554
Location
Austin, Tx
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Subsea - Also, I always read 3.94 µg/l as 3.94 part per bilion (ppb)
If that’s the case, then you don’t have much copper.
When I sent Red Ogo to be analyzed by regional agriculture lab, analysis showed 4 ppm Cu and 2 ppm Zn. However, neither ground water or system water showed those heavy metals at a detection limit of 5 ppb. The EPA allows for 1.3 ppm / 1300 ppb of copper in drinking water
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
R

reefinusa

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Location
Montana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well water is always a gamble, probably should be tested, and then a RODI system designed to deal with what your working with needs to happen.

If you really have copper this is not good. Essentially zero is the only acceptable number.
That's what I thought too! Which is why I'm worried. I will say my RODI is showing 0 copper, so that's good, but maybe it snuck its way into my tank when my filters were bad?

I did think/worry I had a problem with copper before this test (about 2 months ago) because I had CuC dying randomly. I bought a salifert copper test kit and it came back 0 - And I just did it again and it's 0 again - but maybe it's testing a different kind/component of copper? I seem to remember it'd only pick up certain variants or some such thing.
 

Attachments

  • 20251113_093702.jpg
    20251113_093702.jpg
    135.6 KB · Views: 27

BryanM

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 27, 2024
Messages
7,651
Reaction score
9,359
Location
Morgan Hill
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
That's what I thought too! Which is why I'm worried. I will say my RODI is showing 0 copper, so that's good, but maybe it snuck its way into my tank when my filters were bad?

I did think/worry I had a problem with copper before this test (about 2 months ago) because I had CuC dying randomly. I bought a salifert copper test kit and it came back 0 - And I just did it again and it's 0 again - but maybe it's testing a different kind/component of copper? I seem to remember it'd only pick up certain variants or some such thing.
Seems likely if part of your RODI filters were bad.

I choose ICP tests that also test my RODI water, and I assume if there was copper in the RODI it would show up there.

But it would also be good IMO to have the well water tested so you know what you're working with.
 
OP
OP
R

reefinusa

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Location
Montana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Seems likely if part of your RODI filters were bad.

I choose ICP tests that also test my RODI water, and I assume if there was copper in the RODI it would show up there.

But it would also be good IMO to have the well water tested so you know what you're working with.
agreed - in the meantime, I think the plan is to throw some media at it to filter out anything that i can (probably including some useful elements as well. I can either do a water change or I have all of the elements on hand to dose back into the system as I get future ICP tests back (which I'll probably do another test in a week or two.

If anyone has any other thoughts or experiences, please let me know! Thanks!
 

obanarama

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 23, 2025
Messages
157
Reaction score
170
Location
Taos
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Whenever I start to see silicates in our RODI water ICP test results then I know it's time to swap out the DI cartridge in our RODI filter as its letting stuff through.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top