Salinity level

Wich do you prefer ?


  • Total voters
    98

Mark3

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Messages
432
Reaction score
309
Location
SPRING HILL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I hold very steady between 1.025 and 1.026
 

Attachments

  • 20230808_151710.jpg
    20230808_151710.jpg
    143.5 KB · Views: 67

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,236
Reaction score
92,252
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Because of the high variability of salinity measuring devices typically used by hobbyists, we are very fortunate that most reef aquariums are quite forgiving in relation to salinity levels.
 

Hans-Werner

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
3,042
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

vetteguy53081

Well known Member and monster tank lover
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
108,089
Reaction score
242,651
Location
Wisconsin -
Rating - 100%
17   0   0
1.025 for many years. Main reason, ,,, in the event of evaporation , it doesnt get too high
 

Timfish

Crusty Old Salt
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
4,468
Reaction score
5,477
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
... but experiments were conducted with corals from the Red Sea!

Cultivating them for several years under "normal" conditions doesn't alter their genetics and the enzymes that these genetics encode.

Your right, their genome isn't changed. But I'd point out a few things. First is epigenetics and environment does influence what genes are expressed and how they are expressed (differences in fluorescing and chromo protiens for the same coral under different conditions being obvious examples). The Red Sea's salinity is a range of salinities not a constant, so a genome needs to be able to deal with a range of salinities. The Red Sea is not the only place corals may see high salinities as lagoons may also see high salinities so again a genome needs to be able to deal with different salinities depending on where it lands. We are also dealing with the genomes of the zooxantheallae, further research might show the same coral genome with a different simbiont genome might give different results.

Until we have further research to refine our understanding I see no reason to disregard thier research (I'm looking but haven't found anything yet so please post links if you have any).
 

Hans-Werner

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
3,042
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Your right, their genome isn't changed. But I'd point out a few things. First is epigenetics and environment does influence what genes are expressed and how they are expressed (differences in fluorescing and chromo protiens for the same coral under different conditions being obvious examples). The Red Sea's salinity is a range of salinities not a constant, so a genome needs to be able to deal with a range of salinities. The Red Sea is not the only place corals may see high salinities as lagoons may also see high salinities so again a genome needs to be able to deal with different salinities depending on where it lands. We are also dealing with the genomes of the zooxantheallae, further research might show the same coral genome with a different simbiont genome might give different results.

Until we have further research to refine our understanding I see no reason to disregard thier research (I'm looking but haven't found anything yet so please post links if you have any).
Hmmm, the water of the Mediterreanean in which corals where kept all the time was 38 psu. Pure chance that the salinity where corals "performed" best was also 38 psu? Maybe 3 weeks was not long enough for full adaptation to other salinities.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 44 35.5%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.8%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.5%
Back
Top