Salinity level

Wich do you prefer ?


  • Total voters
    98
I hold very steady between 1.025 and 1.026
 

Attachments

  • 20230808_151710.jpg
    20230808_151710.jpg
    143.5 KB · Views: 72
Because of the high variability of salinity measuring devices typically used by hobbyists, we are very fortunate that most reef aquariums are quite forgiving in relation to salinity levels.
 
Ideally 1.028 - 1.029 sg or 38 psu. Protien content is highest at this number. Also, photosynthetic rates drop off above or below this number.

https://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/181/m181p309.pdf
... but experiments were conducted with corals from the Red Sea!

Cultivating them for several years under "normal" conditions doesn't alter their genetics and the enzymes that these genetics encode.
 
1.025/1.026
 
1.025 for many years. Main reason, ,,, in the event of evaporation , it doesnt get too high
 
... but experiments were conducted with corals from the Red Sea!

Cultivating them for several years under "normal" conditions doesn't alter their genetics and the enzymes that these genetics encode.

Your right, their genome isn't changed. But I'd point out a few things. First is epigenetics and environment does influence what genes are expressed and how they are expressed (differences in fluorescing and chromo protiens for the same coral under different conditions being obvious examples). The Red Sea's salinity is a range of salinities not a constant, so a genome needs to be able to deal with a range of salinities. The Red Sea is not the only place corals may see high salinities as lagoons may also see high salinities so again a genome needs to be able to deal with different salinities depending on where it lands. We are also dealing with the genomes of the zooxantheallae, further research might show the same coral genome with a different simbiont genome might give different results.

Until we have further research to refine our understanding I see no reason to disregard thier research (I'm looking but haven't found anything yet so please post links if you have any).
 
Your right, their genome isn't changed. But I'd point out a few things. First is epigenetics and environment does influence what genes are expressed and how they are expressed (differences in fluorescing and chromo protiens for the same coral under different conditions being obvious examples). The Red Sea's salinity is a range of salinities not a constant, so a genome needs to be able to deal with a range of salinities. The Red Sea is not the only place corals may see high salinities as lagoons may also see high salinities so again a genome needs to be able to deal with different salinities depending on where it lands. We are also dealing with the genomes of the zooxantheallae, further research might show the same coral genome with a different simbiont genome might give different results.

Until we have further research to refine our understanding I see no reason to disregard thier research (I'm looking but haven't found anything yet so please post links if you have any).
Hmmm, the water of the Mediterreanean in which corals where kept all the time was 38 psu. Pure chance that the salinity where corals "performed" best was also 38 psu? Maybe 3 weeks was not long enough for full adaptation to other salinities.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

ARE YOU READY TO CONFESS TO CRAZIEST, DUMBEST, FUNNIEST THING YOU’VE EVER DONE IN REEFING?

  • Yeah, I'll confess! (Share your story in the comments!)

    Votes: 40 53.3%
  • Nah, I'll keep mine a secret...(Don't be like that, share with the class!)

    Votes: 35 46.7%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new