Sicce SDC 6.0 barb sizes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RBuchetto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

RBuchetto

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
Messages
55
Reaction score
41
What state or country do you live in
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey all - I recently setup my AF OceanGuard 435 and purchased an SDC 6.0 as the tank flow rating is around d 850gph and I wanted the ability to dial in the flow when considering the head.

unfortunately the SDC 6.0 comes with a SCH 80 1” to 3/4 reducing barb. This is too big for the DIN 20 +/- return pump tubing. Does anyone know if I can get ahold of a 1” reducer to 1/2 barb? Considering dropping down to the SDC 3.0, but it won’t give me room for error.

I appreciate your time!
 
The pump comes with a number of fittings so there are lots of options but reducing the pump output down that much is normally not the best idea.

1677413039118.png


1677413152167.png


1677413265724.png
 
The pump comes with a number of fittings so there are lots of options but reducing the pump output down that much is normally not the best idea.

1677413039118.png


1677413152167.png


1677413265724.png
Thanks and that’s a good point. I’ll probably return the SDC 6.0 and purchase the 3.0 as it comes with a 1/2” barb fitting. Thanks!
 
The pump comes with a number of fittings so there are lots of options but reducing the pump output down that much is normally not the best idea.

1677413039118.png


1677413152167.png


1677413265724.png

just thought I’d provide an update!

I reached out to bulk reef and had them confirm that the return hose on the Auqaforest tank is actually 3/4”. The SDC 6.0 comes with a 1-1/4” to 1” barb reducer already. BRS recommended getting a 1-1/4” to 3/4” reducing bushing then transition to a 3/4” barb. Since the AF recommends around 850gph for the return, I wouldn’t be maxing out the 6.0 and should be good to go.

They too felt that knocking down to the SDC 3.0, which is rated at 800gph may not provide enough flow once head pressure is factored. they didn’t seem to have a better return pump to specify for the AF 435, so we will see how this works out.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT’S YOUR MOST MEMORABLE EXPERIENCE WITH A CORAL THAT LOOKED LIKE IT MIGHT NOT MAKE IT?

  • I’ve seen a dramatic comeback. I would have sworn it was a goner

    Votes: 12 44.4%
  • A slow recovery, and it got back to looking healthy

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • It came back some, but never looked as good as it used to

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • I tried to save one, but it didn’t make it

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Mine is still struggling...no comeback yet

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • I’ve never had a coral in serious trouble

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • See, this is why I don’t keep corals

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 2 7.4%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new