Using 'New' Reborn

  • Thread starter Thread starter ca1ore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

ca1ore

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
14,193
Reaction score
19,717
Location
Stamford, CT
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
There's been a lot of consternation about the recent reborn product not looking the same as the older. The important thing, of course, is how well it works. Plenty of threads with people complaining that it doesn't look the same .... how about one with hands on experience with how it works. I'll start .....

I run a very large CaRx which requires replenishment about every six months when it reaches 50% fill. I added about 15 lbs. of the 'new' reborn in early November, so about a month. There are some bits of silica and some small rocks, but I did not attempt to remove them. Owing to the smaller size, I was able to get a bit more media into the chamber than before. Chamber is upflow, so shouldn't be a problem. Good news is that the 'new' stuff seems equally effective as a CaRx media. Melt is about the same and it has kept my alkalinity and calcium right where the older media did.
 
Last edited:
There's been a lot of consternation about the recent reborn product not looking the same as the older. The important thing, of course, is how well it works. Plenty of threads with people complaining that it doesn't look the same .... how abut one with hands on experience with how it works. I'll start .....

I run a very large CaRx which requires replenishment about every six months when it reaches 50% fill. I added about 15 lbs. of the 'new' reborn in early November, so about a month. There are some bits of silica and some small rocks, but I did not attempt to remove them. Owing to the smaller size, I was able to get a bit more media into the chamber than before. Chamber is upflow, so shouldn't be a problem. Good news is that the 'new' stuff seems equally effective as a CaRx media. Melt is about the same and it has kept my alkalinity and calcium right where the older media did.

You are right I've not seen anyone report on results. Thanks (although I do not use a reactor :) ) - others should appreciate it!

Hope all is well.
 
Did yours look like this? This has a bunch of shells and other stuff. I would guess it will cause a phosphate bump too.

40154234-4A93-4F4B-84BD-243C2456AB1A.jpeg
 
Hard to say. Take out a few handfuls, wash it off and take a new picture. I saw some shells in my boxes, but not too many.
 
Hard to say. Take out a few handfuls, wash it off and take a new picture. I saw some shells in my boxes, but not too many.

Does still melt at a higher ph melting point, than other cal reactor media's?

Thanks!
 
Does still melt at a higher ph melting point, than other cal reactor media's?

Thanks!

I’m still running my CaRx at around 6.7/6.8. As far as I can see the differences between old and new are the size of the pieces and a lot more ‘rubble’. Though smaller, most are still old coral skeletons so no reason I can think of to expect the pH set point to need changing.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT DO YOU ALWAYS RUN OUT OF AT THE WORST TIME?

  • Salt mix

    Votes: 12 16.4%
  • Fish or coral food

    Votes: 4 5.5%
  • Test kits or reagents

    Votes: 7 9.6%
  • Filter media or replacement fleece

    Votes: 4 5.5%
  • RO/DI filters or supplies

    Votes: 12 16.4%
  • Fragging and repair supplies, like glue or epoxy

    Votes: 8 11.0%
  • I keep a backup of everything

    Votes: 20 27.4%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 6 8.2%

New Posts

Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new