What would you do?

dwair

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
6,768
Location
Shreveport, LA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Waterbox 100.3 Reef Tank (75g DT, 30g Sump). My build thread. Cycled almost 1 month old. 4 fish (3 clowns, 1 yellow tang (small) )

Ok so I'm a crossroads decision time soon. I've got my 2 filter socks (going to probably filter cups here soon). My Skimmer (Thats finally working
:)
)

Now I need my last piece of filtration. I've got 3 options as I see it.

1 - BRS Dual Reactors - GFO/Carbon
2 - Tunze MacroAlgae Reactor
3 - Buy a baffle for the skimmer chamber in my sump to split it and do an actual refugium. Which all I would need is a Light and potentially mess with the flow.

Don't let price affect the decision whatsoever here. Serious question if you had to pick, which of the 3 would you go with?

Thanks
:)
 

Beardo

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
578
Reaction score
700
Location
San Diego, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm sure you will get quite a few different opinions, but me?, I would opt for options 2 or 3. Probably leaning towards 2 as I dont know how big the refugium section you create would be and if it would be big enough to be useful.
I'm not a huge fan of gfo, especially on a regular basis and when I do run carbon I just use a mesh bag in the sump.
I had reactors at one time but stopped using them and got rid of em.
All that said, you may be able to wait since tank is still new.
 

andrewkw

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
6,836
Location
Ontario, Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I personally prefer GFO and Carbon over either a fuge or a macro algae reactor. However if you are doing reactors and cost is not an issue you can always have both. Run carbon and gfo when you need to, and don't when you don't.
 

Vette67

Reefing since 1997
View Badges
Joined
Mar 1, 2017
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
3,088
Location
North Olmsted, Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Remote refugium gets my vote. If you have any extra room at all, I’m assuming under your tank, and around your sump, I’d do a remote fuge, as big as you can fit. That way it can hopefully be bigger than just a small chamber in your sump, and hold more life; chaeto, sand, pods, etc...

But that all depends on real estate.
 

dbowman5

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 19, 2020
Messages
2,299
Reaction score
11,493
Location
Dayton, Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
the skimmer section is a bout 4 gallons, depending on the dimensions of the skimmer you would get maybe 2 gallons for the 'fuge or 2% of total volume. my 'fuge is 15 gal on a 90 gal total volume system. on yours would you have media for the fuge? that would also reduce the available volume. let us know what you decide. and how that works out.
 
OP
OP
dwair

dwair

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
6,768
Location
Shreveport, LA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Remote refugium gets my vote. If you have any extra room at all, I’m assuming under your tank, and around your sump, I’d do a remote fuge, as big as you can fit. That way it can hopefully be bigger than just a small chamber in your sump, and hold more life; chaeto, sand, pods, etc...

But that all depends on real estate.

So I've thought about this as well. I don't have room in the cabinet for a remote refuge, but I could easily build another cabinet, I have plenty of space around the tank in my office room. My problem with doing that is I have no idea how to do it, plumbing wise. Would I add in a Y into the Drain line to go to the remote fuge and then put in its own return pump back to the return pump chamber of my sump? Would probably need screens for the pump in the fuge to not grab chaeto.
 
OP
OP
dwair

dwair

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
6,768
Location
Shreveport, LA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I personally prefer GFO and Carbon over either a fuge or a macro algae reactor. However if you are doing reactors and cost is not an issue you can always have both. Run carbon and gfo when you need to, and don't when you don't.
Both is not an option as I'm limited on space and I'm not pulling a GFO/Carbon Reactor setup out to do a fuge and then add in if i Need gfo/carbon. Its 1 or the other.
 

Vette67

Reefing since 1997
View Badges
Joined
Mar 1, 2017
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
3,088
Location
North Olmsted, Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So I've thought about this as well. I don't have room in the cabinet for a remote refuge, but I could easily build another cabinet, I have plenty of space around the tank in my office room. My problem with doing that is I have no idea how to do it, plumbing wise. Would I add in a Y into the Drain line to go to the remote fuge and then put in its own return pump back to the return pump chamber of my sump? Would probably need screens for the pump in the fuge to not grab chaeto.
Easiest way is to do an overflow. Whatever tank you use, make sure the water level is above your sump. Then you can use a small overflow tube and the water will gravity drain back into your sump. Might have to drill whatever tank you use and put a bulkhead in it. Much easier to drill an acrylic tank, but even drilling a bulkhead hole in glass is not that difficult. There are many videos on how to do this. A simple power head to feed water in, and gravity to overflow back out.
 
OP
OP
dwair

dwair

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
6,768
Location
Shreveport, LA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am leaning more towards the Tunze Macro Algae reactor as I won't have alot of space for the refugium in the sump after splitting it with a baffle. And I don't particuarly want to do a remote fuge.
 

Thespammailaccount

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
4,274
Reaction score
15,567
Location
Houston
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No, don't want to do that as it requires alot more than just sticking in a reactor into my already plumbed sump.
Doesn’t have to be mine is just pvc attached to a pump. Have tried a fuge and a macro reactor and it does ok but like others said you are going to need more room than a small section or percentage of total volume to actually make a dent in nutrients. Just made mine this week. Might have to cut some of the screen or reduce lighting period. My screen is currently 12x9 or large enough to feed 9 cubes of food daily

B22A194D-62FC-4043-9BE2-C36402691D3D.jpeg 1F309E80-A258-4BCC-A26D-C61162A3BDE9.jpeg
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
dwair

dwair

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
6,768
Location
Shreveport, LA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Doesn’t have to be mine is just pvc attached to a pump. Have tried a fuge and a macro reactor and it does ok but like others said you are going to need more room than a small section or percentage of total volume to actually make a dent in nutrients. Just made mine this week. Might have to cut some of the screen or reduce lighting period. My screen is currently 12x9 or large enough to feed 9 cubes of food daily

B22A194D-62FC-4043-9BE2-C36402691D3D.jpeg 1F309E80-A258-4BCC-A26D-C61162A3BDE9.jpeg
Algae scrubber just not my thing, not something I want to run
 

mike550

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Messages
2,266
Reaction score
2,378
Location
Chicago
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Waterbox 100.3 Reef Tank (75g DT, 30g Sump). My build thread. Cycled almost 1 month old. 4 fish (3 clowns, 1 yellow tang (small) )

Ok so I'm a crossroads decision time soon. I've got my 2 filter socks (going to probably filter cups here soon). My Skimmer (Thats finally working
:)
)

Now I need my last piece of filtration. I've got 3 options as I see it.

1 - BRS Dual Reactors - GFO/Carbon
2 - Tunze MacroAlgae Reactor
3 - Buy a baffle for the skimmer chamber in my sump to split it and do an actual refugium. Which all I would need is a Light and potentially mess with the flow.

Don't let price affect the decision whatsoever here. Serious question if you had to pick, which of the 3 would you go with?

Thanks
:)
So I’ll ask the newbie question. What will any of these options do for your tank that isn’t already being handled by two filter socks and a skimmer?
 

mike550

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Messages
2,266
Reaction score
2,378
Location
Chicago
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Depends on your setup, larger systems it isn't enough.
Good to know. I have a 120G and 35G sump. But as a newbie I’ve just been using a skimmer, filter socks, and water changes.
 

Algae invading algae: Have you had unwanted algae in your good macroalgae?

  • I regularly have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 8 40.0%
  • I occasionally have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 3 15.0%
  • I rarely have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 2 10.0%
  • I never have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 2 10.0%
  • I don’t have macroalgae.

    Votes: 5 25.0%
  • Other.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top