Which Activated Carbon Do You Use?

Do you use activated carbon and if so which one?

  • Yes I use.....add to thread

    Votes: 209 71.8%
  • No

    Votes: 82 28.2%

  • Total voters
    291
OP
OP
CCK_8814

CCK_8814

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2018
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
1,601
Location
Detroit
Rating - 95.2%
39   2   1
One other thing before I commit. A lot of you appear to be running it in a reactor. I would be running it in a bag inside my filter socks. I saw a few comments while researching rox of people who also ran it in a bag in their sock and it turning their water black from the Carbon even after they had rinsed it.
 

DSC reef

Coral wasted
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
16,279
Reaction score
46,815
Location
West Melbourne
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
One other thing before I commit. A lot of you appear to be running it in a reactor. I would be running it in a bag inside my filter socks. I saw a few comments while researching rox of people who also ran it in a bag in their sock and it turning their water black from the Carbon even after they had rinsed it.
I never ran carbon in a reactor. I'd stay away from putting it in a sock, a lot of turbulence will slowly grind up the carbon. Always had it in a bag in the sump in a good flow area.
 

Scrubber_steve

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
3,224
Reaction score
4,801
Location
down under
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
One other thing before I commit. A lot of you appear to be running it in a reactor. I would be running it in a bag inside my filter socks. I saw a few comments while researching rox of people who also ran it in a bag in their sock and it turning their water black from the Carbon even after they had rinsed it.
I'm not a fan of using ROX in a bag. Its a very fine granule, literally 0.8mm. The mesh grade of the bag has to be so fine it would restrict water flow through it. I made a passive reactor that enables the water to flow right through the granules for complete contact.
 

Bob Loblaw

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
839
Reaction score
1,417
Location
Baton Rouge
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Rox was my go to, think I still have half a 5 gallon bucket of it in the garage. Switched to Purigen for current tank. I like being able to see when it's exhausted and don't like any dust (not much with Rox) in a tank with large angels and tangs.
 
OP
OP
CCK_8814

CCK_8814

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2018
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
1,601
Location
Detroit
Rating - 95.2%
39   2   1
Went to 3 out of the 5 LFS I have by me today. None of them carried rox .8. Waiting to hear back from few of people that posted here as to whether they run reactor or a filter bag. Picked up some bulk Kent marine carbon to get me by. Not as pricey as rox but was $25 for 2.5lbs. Believe it’s manufactured and not sourced also guaranteed to be nitrate and phosphate free so went with it for time being to get me through till I decide on a permanent solution. Those running carbon reactors, did you switch from running it in a bag? If so why & also did you have any noticeable differences? There’s plenty of used reactors for sale by me I can pickup. My sump is not that big unfortunately so I want to avoid more equipment in it if at all possible but if there truly is more pros to cons over running a carbon reactor I’m all for it. As I mentioned before, my main reason for using is to filter out toxins due to coral & bta warfare.
 
OP
OP
CCK_8814

CCK_8814

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2018
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
1,601
Location
Detroit
Rating - 95.2%
39   2   1
Anyone with input/experiences on running carbon in a filter bag vs reactor?
 

JMetaxas

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 30, 2017
Messages
1,203
Reaction score
665
Location
Old Saybrook, CT - Dec 2017
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've done both. The Rox 0.8 needs to be in a fine mesh bag, but personally I don't think this is a problem as I normally place it in a high flow area of the sump where water more or less gets forced through it.

I think BRS did a video on a bag vs. reactor and showed a reactor works faster at removing organics, but I'm not sure that's necessary when you leave it in a few weeks at a time.

If you need to remove a contaminate, or medication, then I'd definitely use a reactor.
 
OP
OP
CCK_8814

CCK_8814

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2018
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
1,601
Location
Detroit
Rating - 95.2%
39   2   1
My issue is my sump has no “chambers”, it’s fully open. Because of this I have to keep the bag inside my filter sock since it’s the only place there really any flow.
44c66820eaefa1ab5ca11a8e4365947b.jpg
 

that Reef Guy

Frag Swap Crusader!
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
11,636
Reaction score
1,059
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So sounds like rox.8 is the general consensus. I’m guessing none of my LFS will have it in stock so now I’ll ask what would you recommend I use for the time being? I have water changes tomorrow so need something to get me by for that. As I mentioned I have to change carbon every 3-4 days due to warfare but changing tomorrow should get me through till some rox 8 comes in.

Try Pet Connection in Livonia

Its right down the Road from House of Pets

They Specialize in Saltwater too
 
OP
OP
CCK_8814

CCK_8814

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2018
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
1,601
Location
Detroit
Rating - 95.2%
39   2   1
Try Pet Connection in Livonia

Its right down the Road from House of Pets

They Specialize in Saltwater too

I’m at Pet Connection basically every other day. I went there today and that’s where I ended up getting the Kent Marine Carbon in bulk. They did not have the rox .8. House of pets never really has much saltwater dry goods. Plus ever since they moved to their new location their saltwater livestock is still being filled and while they’ve added some dry goods they still don’t carry a whole lot. They’ve started keeping some decent equipment on hand (skimmers, reactors, etc) but that’s about it. I’ve done some work for them in the past so I know the owner well. Ever since the manager, Amber, passed away the saltwater section has gone down hill. The owner also swears that running CaribSea ARM reactor media in a regular reactor without C02 does the same thing as a calcium reactor....
 

JMetaxas

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 30, 2017
Messages
1,203
Reaction score
665
Location
Old Saybrook, CT - Dec 2017
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
My issue is my sump has no “chambers”, it’s fully open. Because of this I have to keep the bag inside my filter sock since it’s the only place there really any flow.
44c66820eaefa1ab5ca11a8e4365947b.jpg

I'd run a reactor then. I'd be concerned the Rox .8 would get beaten up in there and turn to fine dust.
 
OP
OP
CCK_8814

CCK_8814

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2018
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
1,601
Location
Detroit
Rating - 95.2%
39   2   1
I'd run a reactor then. I'd be concerned the Rox .8 would get beaten up in there and turn to fine dust.

Ya I was afraid of that. As you can see from the pic of my sump I’m very limited on room. Will have to figure out a way to mount it externally since I do have a small clown that resides in the sump.
 

scardall

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
2,609
Reaction score
1,762
Location
Cocoa, Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I never ran carbon in a reactor. I'd stay away from putting it in a sock, a lot of turbulence will slowly grind up the carbon. Always had it in a bag in the sump in a good flow area.
I use a reactor for carbon and another for GFO. I use media bags in the reactors. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07FNCCZYK/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 or https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007AA46RG/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s01?ie=UTF8&psc=1 (1st closes with zipper(all Plastic) (2nd velcro closing)
 

vetteguy53081

Well known Member and monster tank lover
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
108,504
Reaction score
243,920
Location
Wisconsin -
Rating - 100%
17   0   0
ROx and marineland Lab Grade
 

SteadyC

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Messages
312
Reaction score
244
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
BRS large particle lignite, in a reactor. Carbon is a short term (3-4 weeks) throw away product, so I am happy with the middle of the road product.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 53 41.4%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 5 3.9%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 50 39.1%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 38 29.7%

New Posts

Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new