While we are talking about filter socks and other media... Question:

Jim Harrison

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 5, 2017
Messages
235
Reaction score
176
Location
Salem, OR
What state or country do you live in
Oregon
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've built my sump a little high on the water line, so I don't think I will have enough space to use filter floss as a media. I've got about 3'-4" (will need to measure when I get home) of clearance above the water line. Seems I'm going to have to go with a filter sock, yeah?

Filter socks are ok submerged as long as the top clears the water line from what I understand.

Filter floss needs to clear the water line in order to be effective as I understand it.

Is my thinking correct on this? Or can I have a partially submerged section of filter floss?

I'm building my sump, so any suggestions or opinions are greatly appreciated.
 
It doesn't need to be submerged or exposed to be effective. Think spaghetti strainer. Both are mechanical filters, and strainers.

Personally I would prefer it to be submerged as the dry portions will have die off due to being exposed to air.
So as long at the floss blocks(strains) the full flow from the return it's the most effective.
If that makes sense.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHEN REEFING GETS TOUGH, WHAT KEEPS YOU MOST INVESTED?

  • My livestock depends on me, so I keep showing up for them

    Votes: 12 63.2%
  • I look for small signs that things are improving

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • I want to figure out what’s going wrong

    Votes: 1 5.3%
  • I remind myself that rough stretches will pass...just keep reefing

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • I lean on other reefers for advice or encouragement

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I simplify, step back from tinkering, and give the tank time

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • Honestly, sometimes I wonder if I want to keep going

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new