• For a Limited Time the R2R Partner Membership is NOW OPEN! Get some cool swag and chances to win part of over $20,000 in prizes! Click here for more details

100 gallon tank vs nano

Lazys Coral House
Lazys Coral House

Alaeriel

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Messages
315
Reaction score
654
Location
Minneapolis
I'm in the same boat, I have a 200 gallon tank that I can't set up until we buy a house, but it was recommended to me to start with something smaller to get some practical knowledge since I've been researching for years. We set up a 20 gallon nano in August and I'm interested to see where your journey takes you! Larger tanks are more stable, smaller tanks have less/cheaper equipment, and thus easier to fix if (when) something goes wrong. Tons of pros to either option, plenty of cons as well!
 

spiraling

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
932
Reaction score
856
The larger tank offers more stability, so more forgiving for mistakes. The smaller tank is cheaper and easier to set up and will be full of coral faster. If you do both the nano could be your "canary in a coal mine" for the larger tank. Be sure to get an ATO (auto top off) for both tanks, but especially for the nano. The nano can also make a nice QT tank while you get fish.
 
OP
dynastyreefs

dynastyreefs

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 27, 2020
Messages
21
Reaction score
104
Location
dallas
I'm in the same boat, I have a 200 gallon tank that I can't set up until we buy a house, but it was recommended to me to start with something smaller to get some practical knowledge since I've been researching for years. We set up a 20 gallon nano in August and I'm interested to see where your journey takes you! Larger tanks are more stable, smaller tanks have less/cheaper equipment, and thus easier to fix if (when) something goes wrong. Tons of pros to either option, plenty of cons as well!
Welcome!!

How about both?! Double the knowledge????
i am going to end up running both haha
 

spiraling

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
932
Reaction score
856
I have both. I started with the nano (34 gal) and went to the larger tank. I still love my small tank, use it for QT, frag storage, and other times when you just need another tank ;) I will be making it into a chalice show tank - corals I love but don't work with the other tank. If you have the budget, get another. then another, then another. ....
 
Top Shelf Aquatics

Pistondog

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Messages
1,433
Reaction score
3,060
I just started my first ever reef tank I already have a 100 gallon tank that is in the works but also debating on getting a nano and trying that first. Should I just start with the 100 or start off smaller

859EFE99-7E1D-42F6-9347-E77499F97A47.jpeg
Welcome dynastyreefs.
Start with the 100 and sump.
I added a 20g satellite plumbed to same sump, after a couple of years, if you have the room.
 

scdigby

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
309
Reaction score
2,115
Location
Austin
I just started my first ever reef tank I already have a 100 gallon tank that is in the works but also debating on getting a nano and trying that first. Should I just start with the 100 or start off smaller

859EFE99-7E1D-42F6-9347-E77499F97A47.jpeg
1 welcome.jpg

Hello and welcome to R2R! i would start with the 100. If you can afford both then do both, but if i had to make a choice between the two i would go with the 100.
 
Corals.com

Which do you prefer?

  • A few LARGE, not as colorful less expensive, coral colonies filling your tank

    Votes: 112 39.7%
  • A lot of TINY, but very colorful more expensive, frags covering the rock

    Votes: 122 43.3%
  • Other (please explain in thread)

    Votes: 48 17.0%

Online statistics

Members online
2,321
Guests online
4,928
Total visitors
7,249
Battlecorals
Top