Algae scrubber for nano

ZachP

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
323
Reaction score
251
Location
Ogden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a nuvo fusion 20 and I'm starting to wonder if a scrubber would be a more efficient option then a tiny fuge. It looks like the Santa Monica drop .6 would fit perfect if I moved my heater to center return chamber. Then I could also keep my skimmer and media baskets with no problem. Anybody have experience with these scrubbers?
 

pelphrey

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Messages
4,110
Reaction score
5,929
Location
Kentucky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
YouTube "CJ's aquariums algae scrubber"
 

ajmckay

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
72
Reaction score
58
Location
SE Michigan
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think that an algae scrubber generally would be more efficient than a small fuge - which won't really do much as far as nutrient export is concerned.

I think the SM upflow scrubbers should in theory work fine as long as you have the right nutrient mix and maintenance routine. The general consensus is that waterfall type scrubbers are more effective - but you really need a sump for that. Good luck!
 

Devaji

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 27, 2016
Messages
7,865
Reaction score
6,793
Location
Jackson Hole, WY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I thought about doing a DIY upflow or drop style on my 20L nano. I have a upflow on my 90 its going pretty good I agree the water fall would be better tho I do like the upflows as a space saver. I say go for it.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 37 27.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 46 34.1%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 30 22.2%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 12 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.4%
Back
Top