Alk. Question.

occ_motorcycles

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
377
Reaction score
1
Location
Birmingham alabama
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Testing my water today and I am using an API kh test. After testing several times and getting the same result. My kh is less than 17.9 ppm. I have a buffer to raise it up but what should it be at if my calcium is at 450.
 

mike007

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
7,216
Reaction score
400
Location
WEST TEXAS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
2.5 - 3.5 meq/l is pefered for reef tanks.
 

kuyatwo

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
839
Reaction score
15
Location
Flower Mound TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are sure you you are measuring right if less than 17.9 ppm means less than 1 dkh.

I would take a sample of your water to a lfs. Usually API one drop is one dkh make sure you have saltwater test


Sent Via the R2R Forum APP
 
OP
OP
occ_motorcycles

occ_motorcycles

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
377
Reaction score
1
Location
Birmingham alabama
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are sure you you are measuring right if less than 17.9 ppm means less than 1 dkh.

I would take a sample of your water to a lfs. Usually API one drop is one dkh make sure you have saltwater test

Sent Via the R2R Forum APP

It's the salt version. Off to the reef store I go now.
 

mike007

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
7,216
Reaction score
400
Location
WEST TEXAS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
7-10 dkh for reef tanks
 

Davinci

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
143
Reaction score
39
Location
mesa Arizona
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
yeah i would keep it around 11 that would be ideal so that if your dkh fluctuates a little, it will still be in the acceptable range of 8-10
 
OP
OP
occ_motorcycles

occ_motorcycles

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
377
Reaction score
1
Location
Birmingham alabama
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok. After a good trip to the lfs I am not as bad as i thought. I am not less than one I am actually at 133 ppm. That mean I am at 7.45ish degrees of dKH
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,217
Reaction score
8,978
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That's not so bad! I would echo Davinci (post #7, not the historic figure! ;)) in recommending you to bring your alk up to 11 dKH (200 ppm) to give yourself more "room for error" so to speak. It's considered safe to raise your alkalinity by about 50 ppm per day.

-Matt
 
OP
OP
occ_motorcycles

occ_motorcycles

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
377
Reaction score
1
Location
Birmingham alabama
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That's not so bad! I would echo Davinci (post #7, not the historic figure! ;)) in recommending you to bring your alk up to 11 dKH (200 ppm) to give yourself more "room for error" so to speak. It's considered safe to raise your alkalinity by about 50 ppm per day.

-Matt

Yeah to help and cause it was time. I did a 20g water change (the system is about 100g total) today and will check it again tomorrow and see where I am at. If I need to use a buffer I will mix it up tomorrow
 

Davinci

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
143
Reaction score
39
Location
mesa Arizona
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would also reccomend to use red sea coral pro salt which when mixed. it gives you like 11.2 dkh. I belive neo marine only gives around 7.5
 

jedidad

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
526
Reaction score
15
Location
Oklahoma
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
While you are at it toss those crappy API test kits out and get some Salifert one's. API kits are notorious for giving inaccurate results.
 
OP
OP
occ_motorcycles

occ_motorcycles

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
377
Reaction score
1
Location
Birmingham alabama
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
While you are at it toss those crappy API test kits out and get some Salifert one's. API kits are notorious for giving inaccurate results.

I know. I personally don't use tests at home. It's easier and cheaper to just take a water sample to my lfs. These tests were a friends that he let me use over the recent holidays.
 

johntran216

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
42
Reaction score
2
Location
Arlington, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
11dkh is kind of high isn't it? If by some chance it went to 13dkh, that could probably hurt. I believe 9-10dkh is more ideal. Going down to 7 won't hurt, nor up to 12 will do too much harm. Though, if u can keep it consistent at 11dkh, then I suppose that is a good number.
 

beaslbob

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
4,086
Reaction score
956
Location
huntsville, al
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
FWIW and IMHO

It is extremely easy to adjust Alk with common baking soda. See the diy two part stickies here.
 

mike007

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
7,216
Reaction score
400
Location
WEST TEXAS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thats what most companies are selling you for tenfold what baking soda sells for. Go figure!!!
 

always reefin

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
652
Reaction score
23
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Alk is nothing to play with. Baking soda, BE CAREFUL ~ will and can fry! Most important is to try and keep steady. 9-10 in my opinion, but can be based on livestock. Sps likes lower 7.5-8. Different opinions on numbers I welcome and why
 

Wesley42079

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
1,931
Reaction score
241
Location
SAn Jose
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Do yourself a favor and throw out the cheap API test kits.

Only use Salifert, Elos or Red Sea.
 

specvjeff

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
390
Reaction score
16
Location
San Diego, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I highly recommend using the Salifert test kit or the Hannah Checker for Alk. I've used both and like them both.

SDMAS B.O.D. Member
Sent from my Droid RAZR MAXX using Tapatalk 2
 

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 58 42.0%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 5 3.6%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 53 38.4%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 41 29.7%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new