Am I crazy for thinking MH + t5 ?

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
13,802
Reaction score
7,976
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Gotcha. I was curious how you were using it underwater! :) What lux readings do you get at the surface of the water?

Just like on the reef....>10,000 lux.

>10,000 is about an overcast day.

100,000 lux is full direct sun.

Corals have had a lo-o-o-o-ng time to get used to that range. As a result, they seem to do well across that range....with the caveat that more light = more stress for them. So yes, they do well across that range, but no it's not a "more is better" thing.

In a nutshell, I would shoot for >30,000 lux peak(s) at the surface. That should not only hit the minimum requirements, but all the other stuff too. If your intentions are to emulate a 10,000K surface reef, then you would want about twice that amount of light.

I never log actually. The only thing I would look for is the max lux. A 50,000 lux meter will limit you if your using high light. And also stop you from playing around outside in the sun (which I highly reccomend). So I do reccomend a 100,000 to 200,000 Lux model.

Milwaukee makes a submersible sensor. $75 or so. There may be others but I haven't found one yet.

Strangely, even though in the pic earlier mine says 50,000 on the scale switch, it doesn't seem to be limited there. Not sure what the limit is.....maybe 100,000 lux.

I don't garden in direct sun where I'd have to measure levels that high, for better and worse, but the meter has been valuable to me inside and out! I definitely have learned to use it more for other things than just reefing! I can keep tropical plants alive inside for once....so I was (e.g.) able to over-winter my pepper plants last year. :) :)
 

Bruce Burnett

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
1,296
Reaction score
979
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Dana, by way of his classic Advanced Aquarist articles, is the one who convinced me.

Before that – before toasting a tank full of stony corals when I switched to LED – thanks to all the the PAR-bias I ran into while reading, I never even thought about using a lux meter on the tank. ;Facepalm;Facepalm;Facepalm I was an instant advocate. ;Shifty;Smuggrin;Singing
It is ordered will be here Thursday:) Then I can see close to where I am in amount of light.
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
13,802
Reaction score
7,976
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The phone-based meters are painful to use compared to even the most basic handheld. But if you find one that works with your smartphone's light meter (the usual hangup....you will get insane readings if the app isn't calibrated for your sensor) they are still useful and fun to play with while you wait on shipping for the real deal. ;)
 

saltyfilmfolks

Lights! Camera! Reef!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
28,739
Reaction score
40,932
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just like on the reef....>10,000 lux.

>10,000 is about an overcast day.

100,000 lux is full direct sun.

Corals have had a lo-o-o-o-ng time to get used to that range. As a result, they seem to do well across that range....with the caveat that more light = more stress for them. So yes, they do well across that range, but no it's not a "more is better" thing.

In a nutshell, I would shoot for >30,000 lux peak(s) at the surface. That should not only hit the minimum requirements, but all the other stuff too. If your intentions are to emulate a 10,000K surface reef, then you would want about twice that amount of light.



Strangely, even though in the pic earlier mine says 50,000 on the scale switch, it doesn't seem to be limited there. Not sure what the limit is.....maybe 100,000 lux.

I don't garden in direct sun where I'd have to measure levels that high, for better and worse, but the meter has been valuable to me inside and out! I definitely have learned to use it more for other things than just reefing! I can keep tropical plants alive inside for once....so I was (e.g.) able to over-winter my pepper plants last year. :) :)
I think for folks not used to a light meter. Being able to walk around the house and out side in different weather is pretty eye opening.

Top of the tank at 35000 lux. Where. I'm sitting in the house on a sunny day with the lights on. 425lux.
 
OP
OP
pdxmonkeyboy

pdxmonkeyboy

Sticks!! Give me the sticks!
View Badges
Joined
Mar 7, 2017
Messages
2,677
Reaction score
4,610
Location
Hockinson, WA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i think i have had my question sufficiently answered. i am NOT crazy for wanting a MH and T5 fixture. It seems like for what I am looking to do it seems perfect.

Now I just have to find some decent ballasts. That should be easy, i live in a medical and recreational marijuana state. People practically give you a ballast, hood and bulb when you move here :)
 

A. grandis

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
4,735
Reaction score
3,412
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i think i have had my question sufficiently answered. i am NOT crazy for wanting a MH and T5 fixture. It seems like for what I am looking to do it seems perfect.

Now I just have to find some decent ballasts. That should be easy, i live in a medical and recreational marijuana state. People practically give you a ballast, hood and bulb when you move here :)

Make sure you get the right ballast for the bulb you choose.
Free ballast will probably be a junk one...
People can give you more tips about that here.
I don't use halides for at least 15-18 years?! ;Wideyed So I'm not up to date with this.
Would be great if people could chime in with suggestions and experiences in this regard.
Electronic ballasts, of course...
I think I would choose this one, if I could set up another system here:
209943_luxcore_250w_400w-a.jpg
209943_luxcore_250w_400w-d.jpg

They run cooler, silently and more lumens per watt.
They also have circuit breaker with a 3 year warranty.
You can use them with the Spectra MH/T5 fixture too.
;)
Grandis.
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
13,802
Reaction score
7,976
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just like on the reef....>10,000 lux.

>10,000 is about an overcast day.

100,000 lux is full direct sun.

@AllSignsPointToFish I goofed on my numbers.

1,000 lux is an overcast day. And yes corals do survive down to levels that low....with a reliable food supply they would even thrive.

10,000 lux is about normal daylight.

100,000 lux is full direct sunlight.
 

rockskimmerflow

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
620
Reaction score
632
Location
Socal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Make sure you get the right ballast for the bulb you choose.
Free ballast will probably be a junk one...
People can give you more tips about that here.
I don't use halides for at least 15-18 years?! ;Wideyed So I'm not up to date with this.
Would be great if people could chime in with suggestions and experiences in this regard.
Electronic ballasts, of course...
I think I would choose this one, if I could set up another system here:
209943_luxcore_250w_400w-a.jpg
209943_luxcore_250w_400w-d.jpg

They run cooler, silently and more lumens per watt.
They also have circuit breaker with a 3 year warranty.
You can use them with the Spectra MH/T5 fixture too.
;)
Grandis.
Electronic Ballasts are great for ease of use and flexibility. I know they tend to underdrive some bulbs, so I do prefer Magnetic HQI ballasts when running 250w DE bulbs or SE 250w Radiums. The magnetic ballasts seem to burn them for a couple months longer and definitely produces a crisper, brighter light. I'm not sure if the good ole magnetics are even readily available these days though. The electronics may be the only choice and I agree that luxcore would be an excellent option.
 

A. grandis

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
4,735
Reaction score
3,412
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Electronic Ballasts are great for ease of use and flexibility. I know they tend to underdrive some bulbs, so I do prefer Magnetic HQI ballasts when running 250w DE bulbs or SE 250w Radiums. The magnetic ballasts seem to burn them for a couple months longer and definitely produces a crisper, brighter light. I'm not sure if the good ole magnetics are even readily available these days though. The electronics may be the only choice and I agree that luxcore would be an excellent option.
So the electronic ballasts save some electricity running cooler, while the old style magnetic ballasts would allow longer life to the bulbs, with the perfect intensity/wattage offered. Can we see the spectrum difference using electronic ballasts as the bulb ages, like we could see with the magnetic ones back in the day?
Grandis.
 

Murica

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
2,996
Reaction score
10,666
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've asked this question to, and I know this has been talked about on this thread but electricity plus bulb replacement adds up to big bucks over the years, is it still worth it compared to.. Let's say sb lights?
 

Radman73

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
1,514
Reaction score
1,714
Location
Winter Garden, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i think i have had my question sufficiently answered. i am NOT crazy for wanting a MH and T5 fixture. It seems like for what I am looking to do it seems perfect.

Now I just have to find some decent ballasts. That should be easy, i live in a medical and recreational marijuana state. People practically give you a ballast, hood and bulb when you move here :)

Definitely NOT crazy. I was actually set on MH + T5 for my new tank. Turns out my office is the hottest room in the new house though and MH would turn it into a sauna. Opted for Kessil AP700's instead. No disco effect, great shimmer, and great quality light. Different strokes for different folks. Don't understand the LED bashing. MH, T5, and LED are all capable of growing coral and producing good colors. They each have trade offs as well. What's important is finding the technology that is the right fit for you. Seems like you found it!
 

DSC reef

Coral wasted
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
15,906
Reaction score
50,359
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've asked this question to, and I know this has been talked about on this thread but electricity plus bulb replacement adds up to big bucks over the years, is it still worth it compared to.. Let's say sb lights?
It depends on the individual. Me personally, I'm willing to pay the extra to have a tank I work hard for to have the look I want. We all know different lights grow coral, no debate there. I want that halide look and shimmer.
 

reefwiser

LMAS
View Badges
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
7,539
Reaction score
9,527
Location
Louisville,Kentucky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You will not go wrong using MH and T5 with a SPS tank they love the light and you get no issues that need correcting by the addition of more light. One less issue for you to worry about.
 

jda

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
14,325
Reaction score
22,153
Location
Boulder, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i think i have had my question sufficiently answered. i am NOT crazy for wanting a MH and T5 fixture. It seems like for what I am looking to do it seems perfect.

Now I just have to find some decent ballasts. That should be easy, i live in a medical and recreational marijuana state. People practically give you a ballast, hood and bulb when you move here :)

Being a full-on hippie-lettuce-is-legal state in Colorado, the ballasts, hood and bulb that they give you when you move in here are usually 600W HPS or even 1000W. Even the 250W stuff are usually junk. I would recommend a reef quality ballast.

Pick your bulb and then pick the ballast. M80 is a great ballast choice since they run some of the best bulbs quite well - 14K Phoenix (DE), 20K Radium (SE), 10K Hamilton and XM are still great driven on M80 (SE overdriven, but nice color and outstanding growth).

For people with smaller tanks or who think that heat is an issue (it is not if you plan for it), then 150W Halides are great lights... low power with great output, spread and color. In an application where a pair of point-source lights is needed to handle the spread, 150W MH will get the job done with less electricity and usually better coverage. ...they are not for everybody, though... the gold standard 14K Phoenix 150W bulb will only last TWO years and some folks like to change panels more often than this.
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
13,802
Reaction score
7,976
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
150W Halides are great lights...

Until 150w Radiums went out of production... ;Blackeye;Dead

I loved my 36" dual-150w Coralife fixture.....still have it, in fact. I just don't use it. :rolleyes::) It blasted Radiums for nearly 5 years over my system though. (Please do not add up the bulbs costs for me.;Stinkyfeet) At first over a 36x12x19H" tank, later over a 36x18x18H". Equally awesome over both.
 

bif24701

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 22, 2016
Messages
3,018
Reaction score
2,207
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Definitely NOT crazy. I was actually set on MH + T5 for my new tank. Turns out my office is the hottest room in the new house though and MH would turn it into a sauna. Opted for Kessil AP700's instead. No disco effect, great shimmer, and great quality light. Different strokes for different folks. Don't understand the LED bashing. MH, T5, and LED are all capable of growing coral and producing good colors. They each have trade offs as well. What's important is finding the technology that is the right fit for you. Seems like you found it!

My AP700 is the best decision I have made with my system. I had MH before and loved them but I got over them real quick once I got my Kessil
I'll never look back. Best looking and performing LED today.
 

Jeremy Luke

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
547
Reaction score
358
Location
Northern VA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
How is it for heat?

I have no heat issues at all. The fixture is suspended from the ceiling over the tank so heat can't get trapped in a hood. The heaters probably aren't on as much while the halides are on but the temperature of the tank never departs from the 25C - 25.4C range that my Profilux keeps it at. I do not utilize any methods to reduce water temperature.
 

High pressure shells: Do you look for signs of stress in the invertebrates in your reef tank?

  • I regularly look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 36 31.3%
  • I occasionally look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 28 24.3%
  • I rarely look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 21 18.3%
  • I never look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 30 26.1%
  • Other.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top