Another velvet defeat

reef_junkie

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
422
Reaction score
192
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is just a rant as I don't think my situation can be helped and hopefully someone can learn from my mistake.

5 weeks ago I bought a hippo, a pipefish and 5 chromis from a wild collector. I had a running qt setup. The hippo died the second week but the chromis looked good, actively eating and not hiding. I decided at week 3 that they had had enough qt and moved them to the display. I'm convinced that my qt was wrong, maybe I should have only qt'd one fish at a time. I should have waited. The point is that I AM STUPID. Don't be stupid with your qt.

It started about two weeks ago. So far I've lost a pipe fish, blue tang, sailfin tang, engineer Goby, 3 chromis. I'm getting ready for work now and with the lights off its apparant the tank is cloudy.
I can't find and dead fish but I have a feeling it's not going to be a nice tank to look at when I get home this evening.

I did try a copper based treatment in qt and that only proved fatal in 12 hours. Velvet is a nasty bug and it seems that you don't get much warning. I saw my sailfin looking fine in the morning on Monday then dead by 4:00 that afternoon. This is the worst feeling.

I'm at a loss, thinking this is it for me.
 

Humblefish

Dr. Fish
View Badges
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
22,424
Reaction score
31,573
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Here is the related thread in the fish disease forum: https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/velvet.255293/

I deal with velvet quite a bit and this protocol is successful most of the time: https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/velvet-amyloodinium-ocellatum.217570/#post-2499437

In short: Perform a 5 min FW dip, followed up with an acriflavine (or formalin) bath, and then put the fish in a QT and treat with CP (or copper) for at least 2 weeks.

The FW dip/chemical bath provides temporary relief, while CP/copper ensures the fish doesn't get reinfected. In my next experiment, I will be trying hydrogen peroxide to see if it can be a suitable alternative to acriflavine/formalin. I am hoping so because that would be much easier to source on short notice for our members.
 

dragon99

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Messages
2,852
Reaction score
4,111
Location
Texas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Did you ever get a chance to test hydrogen peroxide? While researching my brook problem today I ran across this link which points to some research done on the subject.
http://www.masa.asn.au/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=97&t=212442

Definitely a more available medication and beat the heck out of formalin. I can't see myself dipping my fish (and hands) into a known carcinogen. Even with proper precautions formaldehyde is dangerous in the home.
 

Humblefish

Dr. Fish
View Badges
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
22,424
Reaction score
31,573
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Did you ever get a chance to test hydrogen peroxide?

I haven't. I've been so sidetracked with other projects. Next fish I get in with velvet or brook gets a peroxide bath in lieu of formalin or acriflavine. I promise. :)
 

bios

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 16, 2016
Messages
750
Reaction score
458
Location
camerino italy
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If can help you this is the way I use to treat oodinium,crypto ..
A 60 lt QT with nano skim
6Kg of fresch live rocks
A solution of copper sulphate pentahydrate and methylthionium
Before i prepare it bymyself actually i use oodinol jbl
An excellent test for copper
32 Days of QT
No fish loose from many years
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top