Aqua UV 57 vs Lifegard 55

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daenion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Daenion

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 23, 2022
Messages
368
Reaction score
533
Location
Virginia Beach
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Which one would you pick?

For me the con of Aqua UV is all the threads talking about how it draws about 44w for 57w bulb.

Lifegard seems like a lot plumbing work(I hate plumbing work and aqua UV is easy to do with the 3/4 inch outlet) and used by fewer people.
 
I recently purchased the Lifegard 55w. Functionality has been great so far although it has some annoyances during installation that I had to deal with.

It's overly huge, requires you to source the correct reducing fittings yourself and doesn't really fit anywhere you would want it to. Don't even get me started on the mount screw holes being partially obstructed for no reason.

Then again they all seem to be cumbersome in their own way.
 
IF i were doing it over again would had probably gone with a aqua UV 57 since its so much easier to fit it inside the stand. The Lifegard 55 is a beast
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT’S THE HARDEST PART OF REEFING TO EXPLAIN TO A NON-REEFER?

  • Why a tiny coral frag can cost that much

    Votes: 13 26.5%
  • Why I spend time testing and adjusting water

    Votes: 7 14.3%
  • Why the fish I want might not fit my tank

    Votes: 9 18.4%
  • Why I have buckets, tubing, and salt around the house

    Votes: 1 2.0%
  • Why corals are living animals, not decorations

    Votes: 14 28.6%
  • How much time and attention a reef takes

    Votes: 14 28.6%
  • The difference between freshwater and saltwater creatures

    Votes: 2 4.1%
  • I’ve stopped trying to explain

    Votes: 13 26.5%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 6 12.2%

New Posts

Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new