Are elevated nutrients a problem, or not?

WhatCouldGoWrong71

TheDryReef
View Badges
Joined
May 19, 2023
Messages
3,713
Reaction score
2,724
Location
Memphis
Rating - 100%
4   0   0
So, F me. I see what I did wrong. I need to do both tanks differently, but I took part of one and part of the other and made my own. Much like sports betting. Don’t do what I do. I had the instructions out as this is a 1 ML vs others from them at 2. dang it Jim! Sigh… lol. Ok. Let’s try this again.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    241 KB · Views: 49

SDchris

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
198
Reaction score
225
Location
Sydney
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Does the starting point matter? Is it the nutrient itself or the "other" associated by-products from the origin of that nutrient that causes problems?
I wouldn't expect similar outcomes from dosing ammonia chloride to the equivalent amount of N in a pile detritus, if the N from both ultimately ends up as 20ppm nitrate.
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
26,954
Reaction score
24,660
Location
Midwest
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Does the starting point matter? Is it the nutrient itself or the "other" associated by-products from the origin of that nutrient that causes problems?
I wouldn't expect similar outcomes from dosing ammonia chloride to the equivalent amount of N in a pile detritus, if the N from both ultimately ends up as 20ppm nitrate.
You're right - it depends on the 'nutrient itself'. EDIT - to answer your question - yes - at some point the 'starting point' matters what that point is depends on your tank and the inhabitants.
 

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 14 33.3%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 3 7.1%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 19 45.2%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 13 31.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new