ATI ICP-MS vs Oceamo ICP-MS

  • Thread starter Thread starter Biff0rz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Biff0rz

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 9, 2020
Messages
2,394
Reaction score
1,442
Location
Michigan (SE)
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Has there been a comprehensive comparison done of the two? I do not know what the differences are. On the surface one is done in USA, another in Austria. Both cost about the same but shipping drives one higher than the other. Besides that, are there actual differences between the tests? I tried to search the forums but couldn't find a solid answer without personal opinions injected. They look like the test about the same amount of elements.
 
ATI is done in Germany. I haven’t seen a comparison between those two but would love to see a super in depth comparisons of all ICP companies to see if any of them are trustworthy enough to use
 
ATI is done in Germany. I haven’t seen a comparison between those two but would love to see a super in depth comparisons of all ICP companies to see if any of them are trustworthy enough to use
ah yes, germany. I saw ati north america when looking but now realize thats just their distribution
 
I’ve not seen any data comparison. I have high confidence in Oceamo. ATI may be equally good, but I have no basis to judge.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHICH SUPPOSEDLY EASY CORAL HAS GIVEN YOU THE MOST TROUBLE?

  • Zoanthids or palythoas

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • Mushrooms or Ricordea

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Green star polyps

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Xenia

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Leather corals

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Duncan or candy cane corals

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Birdsnest or Montipora digitata

    Votes: 5 38.5%
  • None—mine have lived up to the reputation

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Other (tell us which one)

    Votes: 1 7.7%

New Posts

Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new