Quit? Maybe you need to read the entire thread within context and figure out where the inaccuracies and corrections are. And what's "drama"? Those who promulgate inaccuracies based off of dogmatic viewpoints? Or those who pushback in order to correct the record?
My pushback in every way benefits the OP with respect to information on copepods because it dispels dogma with well known facts which are:
The principle copepods species that are purposely cultivated are viewable by the naked eye.
That a large majority of fish species we keep and raise graze on copepods.
Clown fish -like many fish in this hobby- in fact graze on copepods.
Political correctness which can be argued is just another form of "drama" might be your schtick.
I assure you it isn't mine...




BOTH OF YOU. 