DIY Par Meter Question

jisherwood

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
296
Reaction score
83
Location
Montana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok I followed willthethrill post and finally got everything put together but when I test I get low PAR readings.
Tank info:
75gal reef w/ 20gal refugium
2 kessil a360w
Apex controller.
Purchased used Apogee SQ-120, its a few years old. Do I need to send into Apogee to get it recalibrated?
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
13,802
Reaction score
7,976
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You should tag anyone you know of that's made one of these. (I can't remember off-hand.)
 

saltyfilmfolks

Lights! Camera! Reef!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
28,739
Reaction score
40,932
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Did you do a side by side in the sun with both meters?
 

Fritzhamer

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Messages
762
Reaction score
647
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Following along. I was looking to do this today. Wasn't sure if I needed the SQ 520 for LEDs or if the SQ 120 could cut it with some kind of adjustment.
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
13,802
Reaction score
7,976
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Depends what your goals are for the data IMO.
  • Many of us are fine with the output of a standard lux meter. (myself and salty among them)
  • A basic PAR meter is already "better" than our lux meters, depending on your needs.
  • The 5xx-series is "better-yet". Needs.
You get the picture. ;)
 

saltyfilmfolks

Lights! Camera! Reef!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
28,739
Reaction score
40,932
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Following along. I was looking to do this today. Wasn't sure if I needed the SQ 520 for LEDs or if the SQ 120 could cut it with some kind of adjustment.
There is a slight difference yes. But imo after several years of debate over immersion factors, led vs mh etc. discussions with pro growers light manufacturers etc as long as you have a general base line of your par you really are probably ok to use it.

Just understand that you may be off slightly. And the amount is likely to only be 75 par or so.

Think of the constant accuracy vs precision discussions with any test kit we use.
Same thing.
 

saltyfilmfolks

Lights! Camera! Reef!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
28,739
Reaction score
40,932
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Depends what your goals are for the data IMO.
  • Many of us are fine with the output of a standard lux meter. (myself and salty among them)
  • A basic PAR meter is already "better" than our lux meters, depending on your needs.
  • The 5xx-series is "better-yet". Needs.
You get the picture. ;)
Hahah. Yup.
 

Emery

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
192
Reaction score
60
Location
Connecticut
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I just received a SQ-110 model that is sun calibrated. The Apogee rep told me they found the sun calibrated model to have more accuracy. I believe he told me the 110 model is +/- 5% where the 120 model is +/- 10%.

Either way, is send it in for calibration and give the Apogee team a call. They're very helpful and will walk you they the corrective math that you need to do to get the exact Par readings depending on your sensor and light source.
 

Rock solid aquascape: Does the weight of the rocks in your aquascape matter?

  • The weight of the rocks is a key factor.

    Votes: 10 8.0%
  • The weight of the rocks is one of many factors.

    Votes: 43 34.4%
  • The weight of the rocks is a minor factor.

    Votes: 40 32.0%
  • The weight of the rocks is not a factor.

    Votes: 31 24.8%
  • Other.

    Votes: 1 0.8%
Back
Top