Firefish compatibility

Euphylliaphyle

Just your average schmo.
View Badges
Joined
Sep 28, 2025
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
1,551
Location
Eastern NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Does anyone have experience with adding a firefish to a nano already having the following population? Not talking about size, just species compatibility in relatively confined quarters.

Existing fish:
Six-line wrasse
Yellow clown goby
Neon dottyback
Bangaii cardinal
Atlantic pygmy angelfish

Thinking about it, but I can see a few potential issues. Have you had any issues with any of the above when introducing a Firefish? If so, did they work it out?

Thanks in advance!
 

Mr. Mojo Rising

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 14, 2021
Messages
13,336
Reaction score
15,812
Location
Toronto
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You've got a couple of aggressive fish that would make me concerned to add a firefish to this tank. But I don't think anyone can really answer you without knowing the tank size and the amount of rock you have.
 
OP
OP
Euphylliaphyle

Euphylliaphyle

Just your average schmo.
View Badges
Joined
Sep 28, 2025
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
1,551
Location
Eastern NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You've got a couple of aggressive fish that would make me concerned to add a firefish to this tank. But I don't think anyone can really answer you without knowing the tank size and the amount of rock you have.
Thanks... I have a 36 gallon tank and about 55 pounds of rock. Here's a visual:
902188e9-3639-43e4-8a09-62773560c9ff.jpg

Everyone in there so far get along. One of them is another (tiny) goby. He pretty much goes where he wants without hesitation and eats with the (relatively) big boys, who are aggressive feeders. I know the two are very different species, but both being gobies...
 
Last edited:

BryanM

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 27, 2024
Messages
7,652
Reaction score
9,377
Location
Morgan Hill
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
6line and dottyback make this addition tricky. If everyone in there really are model citizens it might work, you appear to have enough rock and places to hide, so that's great.

btw, 36 gallons does not compute as nano in my head :)
 
OP
OP
Euphylliaphyle

Euphylliaphyle

Just your average schmo.
View Badges
Joined
Sep 28, 2025
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
1,551
Location
Eastern NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
6line and dottyback make this addition tricky. If everyone in there really are model citizens it might work, you appear to have enough rock and places to hide, so that's great.

btw, 36 gallons does not compute as nano in my head :)
Thank you. What is the convention for gallons = nano? What would you classify 36 gallons as?
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
8,968
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Existing fish:
Six-line wrasse
Yellow clown goby
Neon dottyback
Bangaii cardinal
Atlantic pygmy angelfish
If you want your fish to have plenty of room to grow and live, I would add no more.....I might even remove one or two.

Attitude-wise, I would only trust one or two fish on your list. ;)

I have a 36 gallon tank and about 55 pounds of rock.
Nice!

btw, 36 gallons does not compute as nano in my head :)
It's a big nano. (50 gallons and smaller; 36")

55 gallons is the smallest "not small tank".

125 Gallons (72") is the smallest big tank.

;)

These are all fun/marketing terms of course....but this is how I spin them to at least be more functional:
  • NANO TANKS – Nano's really aren't great for fish....that's the main fundamental characteristic. At best you can comfortably house some nano sized fish (clowns being the exception!)....everything else is a compromise vs the fish.
  • REGULAR TANKS – "Not small tanks" are OK for some smaller fish, but are hard to grow out bigger corals and won't allow you to have big fish.
  • BIG TANKS – Big tanks are for big fish and big corals.
 
OP
OP
Euphylliaphyle

Euphylliaphyle

Just your average schmo.
View Badges
Joined
Sep 28, 2025
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
1,551
Location
Eastern NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Existing fish:
Six-line wrasse
Yellow clown goby
Neon dottyback
Bangaii cardinal
Atlantic pygmy angelfish
If you want your fish to have plenty of room to grow and live, I would add no more.....I might even remove one or two.

Attitude-wise, I would only trust one or two fish on your list. ;)

I have a 36 gallon tank and about 55 pounds of rock.
Nice!

btw, 36 gallons does not compute as nano in my head :)
It's a big nano. (50 gallons and smaller; 36")

55 gallons is the smallest "not small tank".

125 Gallons (72") is the smallest big tank.

;)

These are all fun/marketing terms of course....but this is how I spin them to at least be more functional:
  • NANO TANKS – Nano's really aren't great for fish....that's the main fundamental characteristic. At best you can comfortably house some nano sized fish (clowns being the exception!)....everything else is a compromise vs the fish.
  • REGULAR TANKS – "Not small tanks" are OK for some smaller fish, but are hard to grow out bigger corals and won't allow you to have big fish.
  • BIG TANKS – Big tanks are for big fish and big corals.
Thank you. I admit that error #1 in my journey was not getting a larger tank!

Big fish and big corals would be nice!
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.0%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 35.7%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 9 7.1%
Back
Top